Showing 1 of 315 conversations about:
Farz
63
Mar 7, 2017
bookmark_border
Mar 7, 2017
Dicloneus
60
Mar 7, 2017
bookmark_border
good post good post. I was really curious about what the differences were between the apex and the ADEL modules.
Mar 7, 2017
AzureSerenity
162
Mar 7, 2017
bookmark_border
This is written by asius, which is the company that makes adels, obviously they are going to claim that ADELs are better. You might want to also read this, which is 64's side of view. http://www.64audio.com/blog/2017/02/20/correcting-the-record/
Mar 7, 2017
Farz
63
Mar 7, 2017
bookmark_border
yup was aware of the bias but still good info. Thanks for the reply and the other perspective.
Mar 7, 2017
chilisauce
15
Mar 8, 2017
bookmark_border
Interesting
Mar 8, 2017
Dicloneus
60
Mar 8, 2017
bookmark_border
It is asius' bad play on their part for criticizing the apex modules with little to no testing at all, but I also find it peculiar how 64 Audio never really released how the apex modules worked and how they differed from the ADEL modules until the report released just last month...? And if 64 Audio does claim they do have a significant effect in protecting the eardrum from pneumatic pressure and decreased occlusion, I think it'd be wise of them to at least post some validating data to support their claims... just a thought.
Mar 8, 2017
chilisauce
15
Mar 9, 2017
bookmark_border
I think the reason behind 64 Audio did not publish any validating data to support there claim is because they themselves(64 Audio) has insufficient data to prove there claim.
Mar 9, 2017
View Full Discussion