Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
JJHJ
5
Apr 24, 2016
Why is the 4 "IIII" instead of "IV"?
MrJamesDuffy
39
Apr 24, 2016
JJHJIt's called a watchmaker's four and has been around for a long time. I hated it until I read this: http://www.ablogtowatch.com/ask-watch-experts/why-do-watch-dials-with-roman-numerals-use-iiii-rather-than-iv/
ChristopherJ
1189
Apr 28, 2016
JJHJIn addition to @MrJamesDuffy's link, I'll add a few more details. Some people think that the IIII balances out the VII across the dial. Also, the IV and VI in close proximity can be a bit confusing. Here's the watchmaker's four on another watch that we have coming up. :)
search
JJHJ
5
Apr 29, 2016
MrJamesDuffyIt doesn't look terrible, but I don't buy the "balancing argument". Just look at the I and XI or the II and the X...
MrJamesDuffy
39
Apr 29, 2016
JJHJFor me, the balance is more with the VIII and XII. I've seen dial layouts with the "proper" Roman numeral IV to indicate the four and that entire right side just looks wimpy, for lack of a better term. Again, I had a problem with IIII at first but my bias has reversed and now IV just looks unsettling on a watch or clock face.
sprk1
232
Apr 29, 2016
ChristopherJNoooooo you're gonna make me buy ANOTHER watch? 😂
rayvaci
18
Apr 29, 2016
ChristopherJWhat is the model number?
Xantaria
4
Apr 29, 2016
rayvaciBlack dial, Black strap 96A135 - Don't know about the other ones.
rayvaci
18
Apr 29, 2016
XantariaNot bulova watch. I meant the Tissot's model number when ChristopherJ mentioned.
ChristopherJ
1189
Apr 29, 2016