Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
bmoore
3
Jun 16, 2015
For those who are looking for a VERY decent beginner to intermediate level camera, you really should check out the Pentax K-50. You can get the black version with 18-55 lens for around $350 and it has much better specs than the Canon in most areas (slightly less megapixels and no HDMI are a couple of the "downsides"). It is a weather sealed camera to both moisture and dust, in-camera image stabilization so no special lenses required for that. It also comes in LOTS of colors :) Not to poo-poo this massdrop, but....
HamishMcGregor
16
Jun 17, 2015
bmooreThe main advantage of the cheaper canon cameras is they use the canon lenses, which are the single most supported lens series on the planet, used by everything from professional photography to cinema cameras. It also is good because you keep the similar controls and even video capabilities to the higher end canon range of APSC sensor DSLRs.
The K50 is still an ok camera. In fact for stills the body is VERY similar, you'd probably not notice the difference of shots once graded and output to a distributable format, and the weather sealing is cool even if the smooth body finish is a little slippery and I'm unlikely to recommend any color but black as any not kit lens is going to be black anyway. For video the K50 does suffer slightly compared to the rebel although its certainly still usable. But your drawback is the pentax range, even the factory kit lens is pretty average, with FAR less ability to upgrade to a better body or adapt non-native lenses. So as a photographer whos had several Pentax cameras in the past (and thousands of dollars of pentax glass) I can't say they have really kept up with the competition since you stopped shooting actual film.
That aside if your looking for a daily use camera and don't mind the extra size of a DSLR then the K-50 is going to be fine, there isn't really much difference so saving a few bucks or a bit more water resistance may make sense. But if your really wanting to get into photography then there is something to be said for grabbing from either Nikon or Canon, it just makes your life much easier in the long run. Canon has cheaper\lighter\more lenses than Nikon, however Nikon's glass is bigger offset so can be adapted to Canon but not vice versa.
HamishMcGregorI have 6 other lenses, an original Rebel and a 20D, so I knew I would be sticking with Canon for the long haul. I love my other two, but they are simply outdated. This camera has 3x the MP than my first one. lol
Mixels
22
Jun 22, 2015
liz.winfrey.venturaThis camera will kick the patootie out of your 20D in almost every way. Definitely a solid upgrade at this price.
That said, I'm mostly saying this because you already have six lenses. :) YMMV on camera body upgrades. Most people see a greater improvement out of investing in higher quality lenses than they do out of upgrading the camera itself. 3x resolution is handy if you want to print your photos in large formats like posters, but for 4x6 and 8x10 prints, even the 20D's meager 8.2MP is more than up for the job. Resolution doesn't speak to image quality at small render resolutions. :)
MixelsNo idea what YMMV is. I do have several very good lenses and some not as good lenses. I probably have more than 6, but I try not to count the kit lenses.
Mixels
22
Jun 22, 2015
liz.winfrey.venturaYMMV means, "Your mileage might vary." :)
MixelsAh, thanks. That's a new one for me :)
timothy-g
0
Nov 19, 2015
HamishMcGregor...however, you will not be taking any of these kit lenses to your next camera. You get what you pay for...my last lens purchase (for Pentax!) was $569 for an immaculate used 70-200mm f2.8...sweet and sharp!