Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Drop Refurbished
Like-new products you can trustDrop Rewards
Get $5 for every 500 points you earn! Learn more
Drop Keyboard Club
Become a member and expand your keycap collectionCollaborate With Us
For Brands & DesignersFollow Drop
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphone-vs-mirrorless-camera,review-2555.html
The S5 sensor wasnt even 1/2.5". Lenses aside, APS-C sensor will murder any smartphone sensor in every image quality area.
Side note: from the looks of the specs, my dual aperture samsung s9+ that I preordered and will get in two weeks will murder this camera in every way and cost a hundred bucks more. The thing can shoot like f1.6. Camera phones now just make this stuff look like canon has been sleeping for 10 years.
Edit: I know it's a mirrorless. So this is some progress I guess, I just fear it isn't enough for them to have any sort of innovative edge in the future now that RED is making phones and Nikon is in everything. What is the role for this company? Printers? 4k was missed opportunity and they can say it's a problem with bus speeds but if a phone can do it, that shouldn't be an excuse.
But I also did not compare the nx3000 to the m6. I did compare the m6 to the 60d in the post after the earlier one you replied to. You should read further down the page, it will help you to make more sense to OP. I did also compare this m6 to my s9+. You should read more better.
edit: please do tell the intricate differences between one manufacturer's mirrorless camera and this one. If you say megapixels or aperture or the aps-c sensor I will lol at you and throw popcorn fair warning.