Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 48 conversations about:
Celestias
2
Feb 16, 2021
bookmark_border
Would have bought it if it had a sapphire caseback. Very lazy of them not to. Now it might as well be a quartz.
andrea_t
112
Feb 18, 2021
bookmark_border
CelestiasAnd the prize for the most stupid comment of 2021 goes to....
TigerUK
296
Feb 21, 2021
bookmark_border
Celestiasmeh, all see through casbacks are bad, they add unncessary thickness to the watch. No need for a glass case. Rolex 3135 is beautiful and they still cover it with a steel caseback - completely undecorated.
Celestias
2
Feb 21, 2021
bookmark_border
TigerUKThank you for your polite opinion.
In my opinion, since this is already a bulky watch by design yet not even a diving watch, a sapphire caseback is not only a good option, but it's even outright recommended, because it fits with the design.
On the other hand, for a slim watch design, I understand and agree about the steel caseback.
andrea_t
112
Feb 23, 2021
bookmark_border
CelestiasLook at those lazy folks at Rolex. No display caseback. How lazy of them. Might as well all be quartz watches... Do you see how stupid your comment sounds?
Drop Refurbished
Like-new products you can trustDrop Rewards
Get $5 for every 500 points you earn! Learn more
Drop Keyboard Club
Become a member and expand your keycap collectionCollaborate With Us
For Brands & DesignersFollow Drop