hi123Thank you for a good suggestion.
When I actually tried it, it sounded muddy overall.
With the default pads, the treble appeal of this product is halved.
I would use EtherCX purchased during the sale if I use AeonOpenX with padding.
(powered by Google translation)
Artismo# 誰が大雪(Ooyuki)やねん!違わい、お幸(Oyuki)ですよw
I think this problem is due to the emphasis on the high range of AOX.
That's because the AOX "Frequency Response" has a valley around 10k as well as the ECX, but the ECX sibilance is not much of a concern.
I'm jealous that you bought the original AFO!
Currently, I live in a countryside in Tokyo.
If there is a chance, I would like to compare it with the original AFO at e-earphon, a famous headphone store in Akihabara.
However, in Japan, AFO costs over 100,000 yen.
If I offer this price, I think I will buy AUDEZ'E LCD2 Closed-Back or HiFiMAN Arya with a little more budget.
Already, I have LCD2 Closed-Back and have HE1000se instead of Arya ...
(powered by Google translation)
Oyuki日本人の名前はちょっと難しいです。すみません、間違いました。
Well, the original I bought when Mr Speakers was having a sale. The price, customs tax, and shipping was cheaper than buying in Japan. I live in Saitama, just outside Tokyo. I was interested in the Drop x Aeon Flow Open because the original is a little treble light and small soundstage. I was recently looking at the Quad ERA-1 too. Different sound signature, but enjoyable. I like the LCD2C closed. Heavy cans!
ArtismoThat was lucky.
I'm curious about the ERA-1, but wouldn't buy it unless Quad launches the next headphones.
As new ERA-1 products are flowing into the used market, I personally expect Quad to withdraw from the Japanese headphone market.
Quad should have taken a sales strategy like FOCAL.
LCD2C / Closed is a great product with a smooth frequency response.
However, it is heavy and requires the power of the amplifier.
(powered by Google translation)