Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
checkVerified Buyer
Overall Happy, Bracelet & Clasp Disappointing.
This is my 3rd Glycine that I have in my collection and I do like the look of it. A GMT is by far my favourite complication on a watch.
search
While controversial, I wish it had a cyclops like the non-GMT version because I like a cyclops, and it helps me to see the date without my glasses. While the bracelet looks nice, I am disappointed with the clasp quality. One side of the clasp lock is not returning to the original position after pressing to release, so I have to tug on the lock so that it engages. I'll have to reach out to Drop Support to see if they will send me a replacement bracelet.
search
Having difficulty finding the "sweet spot" for the size, I have the micro-adjustment pin in the inner hole but it's still just a tad too big. I believe it will be too small if I remove another link, but may give it a shot.
search

Brief comparison to a Tudor BB GMT. I really like the lower height of the Glycine better than the Tudor. Movement wise, the Tudor has an independently adjustable hour hand vs. the independently adjustable 24 hour hand of the Glycine. A more arduous task to set the date on the Tudor vs. the Glycine which has a quick-set date. For obvious reasons the Tudor crown movement (unscrewing, winding, setting time) so much smoother. I prefer the 1/2 hour bezel rotation on the Tudor better than the 1/4 hour on the Glycine.
search

JAone
999
Jan 8, 2021
CaptainSteubingI am with you regarding the cyclops addition, it is one of the reason's I bought the 2020 Seiko Alpinist, and ordered the recent Sub soda version of this watch. The Tudor is just too expensive for me; Drop did have a similar GMT watch with cyclops as well; the Revue Thommen GMT at about $599 I believe; I am waiting for it to come back,hopefully and may buy one. But the Tudor does look good.