Looking at your models, there is no way this shirt will fit me at all. There are lots of different body types! I know that there may be equipment limitations that impact what sizes or shapes you can offer, but it would be great if I could find American-made clothes that were made for American bodies instead of slim models.
NoddyONothing worse than mercilessly fitting clothes. These shirts fit many people well and are not only for slender models. No sense in making a product like that. I am 5'10" 185 lbs / 34 Waist - I have some chunk on me and the Large is a very flattering fit.
NoddyO“American bodies”? What does that even mean? I’m an American and I’m perfectly capable of maintaining my health. Maybe you should put some shoes on and go for a run instead of complaining that clothing doesn’t fit you.
plant_poweredI think based on the fitting suggestions anyone 6'+ would have trouble wearing the XL. Roundness isn't always synonymous with American clothing, we're typically larger vertically as well.
ecolemanThat’s fair, and a more charitable reading than mine, but the original commenter complained that the clothing was for “slim models” as opposed to “American bodies,” which implies that American bodies aren’t slim. Statistically, I suppose it’s also true these days.
plant_poweredBoth are definitely true, width is definitely a concern, but if the L is fitting 5'10", the XL is gonna be tough for people taller. It's rare I see t-shirts that get much longer as sizes go up past L/XL, it's usually just rounder.
ecolemanI'm a long-waisted 5'11.75" (31" inseam) and the XL is a pretty good fit on me. Definitely tuckable. I'm also about 220#, which puts me squarely in the OP's "American body" category and it still fits better than, say an XL Calvin Klein undershirt.
ecolemanIndeed, but by the power of my imagination I'm almost sure this shirt would be able to be tucked in if I were 6.01'. :)
But yeah, if I were 6'4" I'd have to look elsewhere if I wanted a shirt that can be tucked in.