Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
orangesherbet0
20
Sep 11, 2017
This "bad blue light theory" is completely unsupported by science, so don't buy these based on that.
El_zorro
7
Oct 4, 2017
orangesherbet0Has worked for me for the last 2 years and it definitely shows when I don't ware my glasses. I don't know if it works to protect sight loss, but it does to protect against red eyes and the sand feeling discomfort that drops won't fix.
GunnarOptiks
10
Oct 4, 2017
orangesherbet0Check out our website for proof re: blue light. Below is a link to our most recent blog post. There are plenty of studies and other articles to check out as well. https://gunnar.com/nobel-prize-awarded-circadian-rhythm-doctors-artificial-light-affects-sleep/
orangesherbet0
20
Oct 4, 2017
GunnarOptiksI would love to be corrected, but the Nobel prize to which you are referring is for uncovering the mechanisms behind the day/night circadian rhythm. If anything, the research seems to show that exposure to blue light is an important part of the circadian cycle.
More to the point, a meta-analysis of blue-blocking papers http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625709002069 " Intraocular lenses (IOLs) that block both ultraviolet and blue wavelength light (<500 nm) were introduced in the 1990s. Since then, the potential benefits and harm from blocking blue light has been debated. We report the results of a complete review of all peer-reviewed published studies regarding the impact of blocking the transmission of blue light. Fifty-six published reports on subjects related to blue-blocking lenses including sleep disturbance, visual outcomes, cataract surgery, lens transmittance, sunlight exposure, and macular disease were found in peer reviewed journals from 1962 to 2009. Eleven reports specifically compared visual outcomes between blue-blocking IOLs and non-blue-locking IOLs. Of these, 10 independent studies (10/11, 91%) concluded that there are no significant effects of blue-blocking IOLs on various meters of visual performance including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color perception, and photopic, mesopic, and scotopic sensitivities. Only one group of authors reported that the use of blue-blocking IOLs may have detrimental effects on scotopic vision and circadian rhythms. However, the actual clinical significance of these potential negative effects on scotopic vision and on sleep patterns is uncertain. The benefits of blocking the transmission of blue light to the macula and the relationship between progression of age-related macular degeneration remain unclear. However, the published studies clearly state that the use of blue-blocking IOLs is not detrimental in visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity. The reported potential negative effects on scotopic vision and sleep disturbance appear to be minimal and may not be clinically relevant. "
Korinthian
5
Oct 4, 2017
orangesherbet0Hello! As a user of a free alternative to these glasses: the program f.lux, I can tell you that regardless if the science behind this is BS or not, reducing the blue light of the monitor if you spend almost any time in front of the computer feels real nice to your eyes. Try it out for your own sake (why not, right? It's free: justgetflux.com)
Zwei
0
Jan 8, 2018
KorinthianPrograms are good, but I do desktop support and stare at many different monitors that don't have any blue light protection installed. Glasses like these work great in cases like this