Ingersoll New Haven Automatic Watch
Ingersoll New Haven Automatic Watch
bookmark_border
Where's the price?
To negotiate the best possible price for our customers, we agree to hide prices prior to logging in.
516 Sold
Product Description
Founded in New York in 1892, Ingersoll specializes in watches with American heritage. Over the last century plus, the company’s made a lot of timepieces, but perhaps the most indelible is its Mickey Mouse series, which sold more than 5 million pieces throughout the 1930s and '40s Read More

search
close
beanerds2
231
Nov 19, 2020
Could not help myself !! for $93 delivered the blue dial on rose gold is mine !! nice looking watch with great specifications .
Alletiderslasse
19
Nov 18, 2020
Do anyone knows why you can't buy this watch, every single time I try to order it. It just start loading and loading. And nothing happens
beanerds2
231
Nov 19, 2020
I just ordered and pay'd for one just now with no problems , try rebooting and making sure the payment is the one you fill out yourself ,,, apart from that , don't know .
Alletiderslasse
19
Nov 19, 2020
Thanks . I found a way to get it to work. Don't now why, but when I was on our WiFi. It did not work but when I went on my mobile network it worked perfectly. 🙂
Mohandraa
0
Nov 17, 2020
Very Dumb Question, and I know it depends but hear me out. I want to buy this to my soon to be brother in law, He lives in the states and I'm not, he'll travel to meet us on the 27th of December. Q1: What are the chances of him not receiving it before that (since it's suppose to be for the holidays) Q2: Will there be any receipt or invoice in the box? (in our culture it's not nice to show the price of the present)
DennyB
12
Nov 17, 2020
Not a dumb question at all. I think it’s possible, but highly unlikely he gets it before December 27th. These drops don’t ship until the order is full, and they use the slowest possible postage.
RayF
24786
Nov 16, 2020
Usual objections apply. If you don’t know them, not a terrible deal.
Mehoron
72
Dec 9, 2020
What are you talking about with this reply. You go off on tangents and put words in people's mouths that make no sense. You open with a personal slight about someone's age, when none was made toward you. No one made any claims to or even mentioned "authenticity". Hearkening back to something does not imply authenticity in this world or any other, it simply means that it reminds someone of something older. There are also cheaper automatic movements that hack. I'm curious where price plays into this? This isn't even Miyota's most stripped down movement. One could by all means make the movement hack without issue. A good reliable movement doesn't HAVE to be expensive. Lots of quartz movements are cheap and reliable, that was the point of them. To purchase this particular movement to replace it, is around 40 USD, which isn't a lot, but it is nearly half the price of the watch. I also never made claims to any kind of justification to put anything anywhere. I cannot make any justification for why someone made the choice to go with this Miyota movements. I can just say, with certainty, that Miyota(Citizen) movements are generally reliable and good. Given Ingresoll, the history and style of watch it makes sense to put a less expensive 70's movement in it. The watch is vintage styled, it's the same simple case style that the old Ingersoll used in their 60s and 70s watches. That's what makes it vintage styled (not in and of itself vintage). No claim was made that the watch was itself vintage. There are lots of new watches that use a vintage style, this doesn't make them vintage, no one claimed it was. "Theres is NO connection between the Ingersoll you refer to (the dollar watch maker) and the Ingersoll represented above" Yes there is, when you buy a company you also tend to buy their designs and trademarks. That's not implying that Ingersoll had amazing designs to begin with, which was the entire point of bringing it up. It was company that was never founded with the highest of expectations, it was a company that was founded with the ideal to put a watch in everyone's pocket. This watch is extremely accessible, which I would argue is the entire point of an Ingersoll. If you don't agree with that connection that's fine, but it certainly is reminder for me where Ingersoll came from. Making the assertion that it's great for people who don't understand watches also doesn't make sense given Ingersoll's history. You also say "the watch is modern enough" but then say you got rid of it because it doesn't hack and wind, which are more modern automatic movement features. It's "modern enough" but not modern enough for you to hang on to, which again, is fine, all of this is preference anyway, I'm certainly not going to pass judgement on anyone's preferences, and that's not my point. It just adds to the confusing and meandering post that is book-ended by personal attacks and doesn't really talk at all about watches or their history.
(Edited)
RayF
24786
Dec 9, 2020
Sounds like you’re taking this personally.
Fraggler
55
Jun 30, 2020
Nice looking watch, but at 14mm, I find it to be too thick for my tastes.
RayF
24786
Nov 16, 2020
Unfortunately for your tastes, thinner costs more than eighty-nine bucks. But take heart, there’s always Skagen!
TigerUK
278
Jun 30, 2020
Drop did good. Can we commend them for a watch that isn't a BMW ice toy watch, 50mm dusty grahams, and other left behinds that they need to get rid of.
yeeto
2
Jun 25, 2020
If only this was 33-38mm.
frk3
33
Jun 27, 2020
im just a dumb kid, i think times are changing - just like cars got bigger so got watches
RayF
24786
Nov 16, 2020
33mm?! Check the kids department—or wait ’till puberty.
Leoanger
316
Jun 24, 2020
I wonder why not offer mix and match with dial colors and straps/bracelet. Then again, while I want to try a mesh bracelet, and this drop is tempting enough, it appears the mesh was an afterthought.
RayF
24786
Nov 17, 2020
No doubt mounting the ends in a pair of solid endlinks is another option. Not sure why it's not done more often.
Leoanger
316
Nov 17, 2020
I'm guessing it's the ol' "if it's not broken.." mindset. Not enough nitpickers like me to change trends.
Sabinoj
1
Jan 28, 2020
Is there anything on the watch denoting "New Haven"? I don't see anything in the photos.
Hendrix-DK
124
Jun 25, 2020
"New Haven" Yeah what does that mean... ?? The first thing I think about when I hear "Ingersoll" is: "A brown wooden box with sliding lid" :P I "googled" after a lumber shop in New Haven and found "Hermann Lumber" So I think the name "New Haven" is a tribute to a collaborator. But the names of watches do not always make sense.
search
P.s Roger Waters - Perfect sense (Parts 1 and 2): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJjyajuo-7o

0ka7
0
Jan 27, 2020
The only reason I bought this watch is because it has the same name as my city.
(Edited)
mathees
87
Jan 29, 2020
Get some Pepe's for me
Showing 34 of 79
keyboard_arrow_up
Newest
79 OF 79 POSTS
Jan 18, 2021
keyboard_arrow_down
Oldest
Recent Activity
What are you talking about with this reply. You go off on tangents and put words in people's mouths that make no sense. You open with a personal slight about someone's age, when none was made toward you. No one made any claims to or even mentioned "authenticity". Hearkening back to something does not imply authenticity in this world or any other, it simply means that it reminds someone of something older. There are also cheaper automatic movements that hack. I'm curious where price plays into this? This isn't even Miyota's most stripped down movement. One could by all means make the movement hack without issue. A good reliable movement doesn't HAVE to be expensive. Lots of quartz movements are cheap and reliable, that was the point of them. To purchase this particular movement to replace it, is around 40 USD, which isn't a lot, but it is nearly half the price of the watch. I also never made claims to any kind of justification to put anything anywhere. I cannot make any justification for why someone made the choice to go with this Miyota movements. I can just say, with certainty, that Miyota(Citizen) movements are generally reliable and good. Given Ingresoll, the history and style of watch it makes sense to put a less expensive 70's movement in it. The watch is vintage styled, it's the same simple case style that the old Ingersoll used in their 60s and 70s watches. That's what makes it vintage styled (not in and of itself vintage). No claim was made that the watch was itself vintage. There are lots of new watches that use a vintage style, this doesn't make them vintage, no one claimed it was. "Theres is NO connection between the Ingersoll you refer to (the dollar watch maker) and the Ingersoll represented above" Yes there is, when you buy a company you also tend to buy their designs and trademarks. That's not implying that Ingersoll had amazing designs to begin with, which was the entire point of bringing it up. It was company that was never founded with the highest of expectations, it was a company that was founded with the ideal to put a watch in everyone's pocket. This watch is extremely accessible, which I would argue is the entire point of an Ingersoll. If you don't agree with that connection that's fine, but it certainly is reminder for me where Ingersoll came from. Making the assertion that it's great for people who don't understand watches also doesn't make sense given Ingersoll's history. You also say "the watch is modern enough" but then say you got rid of it because it doesn't hack and wind, which are more modern automatic movement features. It's "modern enough" but not modern enough for you to hang on to, which again, is fine, all of this is preference anyway, I'm certainly not going to pass judgement on anyone's preferences, and that's not my point. It just adds to the confusing and meandering post that is book-ended by personal attacks and doesn't really talk at all about watches or their history.
First of all, why would you begin you comment with: "I mean..." as if you were trying to clarify a comment or point you'd made earlier, when in fact, you had not? As far as I can see, this (the comment I'm replying to now) is actually the first comment you've contributed to this (several month old) conversation? I'm going to chalk that bit up to YOUTH (so as not to cast aspersions on your high school English Composition teacher, who probably tried his or her best, but even now winces every time he or she hears someone of your generation begin a sentence with the conjunction/connective word: "So." On that score, I'm with him (or her). Meanwhile, as to you point, (in a nutshell) that Miyota makes bare minimum functioning movements for those unwilling to pay more for better ones, and that somehow justifies Ingersoll's use of them, and to your mind even makes them more authentic? I say, don't make me laugh! Theres is NO connection between the Ingersoll you refer to (the dollar watch maker) and the Ingersoll represented above, NONE, and no one is suggesting there is at this point, not even the Chinese company that bought the right to use those nine letters (only in that particular sequence), not even the people who write the copy for this site and Ingersoll's who claim otherwise! Second, if they have changed the movement due to feedback (I haven't verified that independently) I hope to god I was in some small way, responsible because I have broached the subject on numerous occasions! Thirdly, what the hell do you mean calling this a bloody "vintage style watch"?!!! When the hell did round dials absent of Arabic numerals suddenly become VINTAGE?!!! Dare I ask, when you say "vintage" do you mean it in the Brittany Spears sense of the word, or are we just talking Justin Bieber-vintage? Don't answer that--I don't want to know! Bottom line: the watch is modern enough, not terribly priced, not half-bad looking, and with a better movement (one that does hack and wind) would be a square-deal for anyone whom it may appeal to--PERIOD. If, as I stated earlier, those points (hacking and winding, specifically) don't mean anything to a perspective buyer, he or she is getting the deal of a life-time with this watch. Now "get out'a here kid, you bother me!" [image]