There Are Pandas, and Then There Are Pandas.
And this isn't either of them! The Pandas we're talking about here, are watches, not bears. And what got me thinking about them (again) was a link posted this morning by @cm.rook who pointed a few of us to the very attractive (and not terribly priced) Yema "Rallygraph" Panda which, in it's most traditional arrangement, looks like the one on the left, but can also be had in the version on the right: The model on the left is a true Panda, while the model on the right is called a reverse Panda. The reason for that distinction is clear--Panda bears, only come in the first arrangement. Now at this point, everyone should be thinking about the most well-know Panda, The Rolex Panda, which is actually a Daytona, and among Rolex Daytonas, the most famous of which is the Paul Newman Daytona, which was famous first, because it was Paul's, and second because it sold at auction for $17.8 million (US Dollars). The story of that auction is well-known so I'll only...
Nov 8, 2019
I can't afford to consider anything more expensive, so I can't consider any "but this $800 pen would be my choice if I could only have one" offers, but if there is some amazing pen other than these for around the same price I will take them into consideration.
What makes a cartridge converter less desirable than a piston-filled pen? I will say up front that I would much prefer to use bottled inks than cartridges because I like the idea of having the freedom of choice bottled inks offer and I don't want to be further trapped by a specific cartridge type/size. I don't understand what would be significantly different between refilling a cartridge converter versus the pen itself, though. I assume the cartridge converter is going to hold less ink than the Lamy 2000's reservoir, so there is that, but are there other differences that influence your preference?
Unfortunately, nothing here has really set my decision in stone, as I would love to have a larger pool of nib possibilities like the Studio, but the quality of life differences (like the clip and lower weight) of the 2000 may overtake that. I have had my eye on the 2000 for quite a while, now, and only saw the Studio because of this drop. I might just go ahead and go with my first choice, since I basically had no question which pen I wanted before I stumbled onto this one. :)
At this price, it's hard to know which is really better. If you are torn between a piston-filler and cartridge converter, then I would highly recommend purchasing a cheap cartridge converter pen to try out. Pilot makes a few, but a Jinhao x-750 or something along those lines would also be cheap and allow you to test out that filling mechanism. It will be difficult to test out a piston-filler without spending quite a bit more money as the cheapest I can think of that would arrive within a short timeframe would be a TWSBI Eco or Eco-T. If you have plenty of time, Ebay is great for purchasing cheap piston and c/c pens to test, but the Lamy Studio and 2000 may feel like pulling King Arthur's sword from the stone after using those.
If you want to know more, search "piston vs cartridge converter" online. Pen Chalet has a good article discussing the differences. Jet Pens also has a tutorial on how to fill each with ink. It's on Youtube.
Ever since Massdrop brought the steel Lamy 2000 to their platform, the makrolon version hasn't been seen here. Guess I'll have to pay the extra $20 (given my preference in nib size) and get it from Amazon.