Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 87 conversations about:
BlueTom
384
Jul 19, 2019
bookmark_border
So none of these "high-end" cables are capable of USB-C or 3.0 (or 3.1) speeds? Why buy a cable with a C end if it's only capable of 2.0 speeds? My LG V20 won't even keep up charging with a 2.0 input when running the apps I use all the time. It slows down the discharge, but won't even keep it where it started. Looks like nice cables, but I'm gonna have to pass.
Jul 19, 2019
Tofagerl
122
Jul 23, 2019
bookmark_border
BlueTomThey're usually used for keyboards, which have very low bandwith requirements.
Jul 23, 2019
BlueTom
384
Jul 24, 2019
bookmark_border
TofagerlI appreciate the reply but still am confused about having a USB-C end governed down to only 2.0 speeds. If the device has the USB-C input/output, it's capabale of 3.0/3.1 speeds, right?
Jul 24, 2019
Tofagerl
122
Jul 24, 2019
bookmark_border
BlueTomIt's quite possible that this cable does not conform to the spec, true...
(Edited)
Jul 24, 2019
Aborto
0
Aug 16, 2019
bookmark_border
BlueTomNo, the Type-C connector has no relation to the speed of the protocol running over it, supporting USB3 speeds is not a required part of the specs for the connector. There are plenty of phones with type-C ports that only have USB2 controllers in them, and plenty of commercial type-C cables are also only USB2. The reason for this is USB2 requires 4 conductors, 3.0/3.1 requires 8. Having the full 8 conductors results in much thicker, stiffer cables which is not really worth it when the intended use is for a keyboard that would work at USB1.1 speeds just fine. It is also very difficult to hand solder a type-C connector with all the conductors, they are simply too small for that.
Aug 16, 2019
View Full Discussion
Related Products