Showing 1 of 37 reviews about:
See More Reviews
Is there somthing im doing wrong????
Dac works wonderful. Sounds immaculate. Took me a while to figure out that the red switch was flippable. It sounds amazing. I cannot exaggerate even saying this. But it's a pleasure to the ears and with the la Figaro 339 it sounds wonderful. I am awaiting to try the THX 789 to fully experience the capabilities of balanced audio. I would say this is the nicest dac I've had the pleasure of listening to. Great for the money. Remote is nice and just overall great wow factor in a package. Please do yourself a favor and own it.
Would recommend to a friend.
Dude, the voltage is probably set to 230v. Switch it to US voltage (115).
No pesky ground-loops?
He intended that there wasnt a difference, but it does provide a bit more say "juice" to the audio as well. But only he will figure that out in time 😁
The difference is stated. But from your response and previous in the past to others, it seems you were looking for a different answer. There is a difference. And I'm not sure why're you're so overwhelmed to make that statement. But strongly suggest seeing the "difference".
It would appear here sir, that there may be some differences you're missing. Heavily urging you to see said "difference" and engulf yourself a touch more in the hobby. It goes up from there.
He did ask the question so he genuinely doesn't understand the difference. Ultimately he now knows something to apply, in my experience it doesn't change the whole sound, but there is something different to say the least. Little fuller sounding. Nothing over the top. I have used fiio m11 pro back and forth between balanced and SE. Balanced audio helps on that platform when your headphones need a bit more power to get to volume and sound right. Anyways topping makes an exceptional dac for the money, and this is a must for those who value audio quality.
Not to jump in, but from your responses I'm not sure if you comprehend what they're even talking about. But he's right about your intent. No need to cover the fact that we all want to absorb knowledge like a sponge. But clever way to get the answer. I'm not sure about you being correct, but now knowing the "difference" might change perspective.
I don't think you understand the difference. Also, I only have two accounts in total. And it's not meant to hide as they have the same name, but a different series of numbers. It's always been my account names it stands for the car years that I like from AMC. And the kk being my first initial and last. So again, you're off on the wrong foot. I guess I found more of an agreeance than I thought, but it doesn't resonate well with you at all 😅 thanks for your input though. We do appreciate the technical speculation, but I'm not sure you solved what you're after. It does show that indeed, you are as your profile would suggest. But here we are, figuring out the "difference"
I feel like you honestly played yourself 🤣 this has been the funniest interaction I've ever encountered due to spontaneity. You may be the loon in this case, cause I have no ties to anyone who commented on this thread other than what I mentioned. And that's obvious. The follow up comment was meant to be a joke, then someone actually took it serious. It's way over your head on this one 😂 the noose is tightening.
This has always been your tactic, it doesn't take much to add the countless numbers of other comments you have made. My comments are consistent. Do some research and you'd see that you are the aggressor in this particular situation. But you continue to push your motif in this regard. Everything you said is false and your account also proves how you regularly push the limits. You still haven't solved anything. And nothing sheds light to your defense. You have no explanation. You just keep saying words. At face value, it isn't hard to see. You have more time on your hands to have yet another creative ploy, so I'm positive that will be your next reply as each of your following didn't take guessing skills to figure. You're investigative tactics are preliminary at best. Add some more periods. Space it out some.
Fantastic, it's actually great breaking things down and seeing what you're truly after. All after having a splendid experience with the topping, exploring the balanced audio world, seeing the difference ( or shall I say hearing). I can see your optimistic view must be blocked by a skyscraper built from your own rudimentary fundamentals. Your account shows your comments, which suggests what you're doing here is regular in tactic. Which is achieving a specific end, for the English you lack. So looking at my comments one can see publicly that I'm consistent with positive features. The research being that looking at that, which doesn't really take research but to you it does apply. Then your motif being the pattern of which you commit verbal interaction almost in decorative fashion when speaking to others. There is no right or wrong in this situation, you've escalated it to the point that you have to be right in self assessment. I just wrote a review and here we are. But you surely must be trying to solve something out of this or there'd be no continuation. So your defense is that someone would go out of their way to come back to a review months later to make accounts to call you out? For no particular reason whatsoever than to just dig into your time? That's the answer you just gave. No explanation behind, so just a mingling of vocabulary. The difference being my words make sense, you just keep running in circles with words having no backing in meaning. You also have a hard time spelling correctly in the fit of your rage. So if one were to take this all at "face value" it would appear you are lacking traction you seek. You have no points. You just spun up this idea starting with your false accusation in this thread; what a skit its become. Also, notice how no one has been talking but me and you? Must be the loon in ya
You are a certified loon.