Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 22 conversations about:
ISK
552
Jun 18, 2016
bookmark_border
I wanted to provide more research to people who are reading the discussion and trying to make a decision on this knife’s quality, and also understand the differences between 1095 and 154cm steels.
Aside from the metallurgical aspects of a steel, factors other than steel type typically have far greater impact on any knife's performance in the field. The geometry of the bevel(s) and precision of the grind affect cutting performance to a greater degree than the steel. The heat treat plays a much greater role than steel type does in terms of a blade's durability and edge retention.
This particular knife is produced by a small manufacturer in the USA from all American materials. Having held this knife, I can tell you that it's very comfortable in hand and more than suitable for its intended use: a heavy-duty fixed blade that can perform a variety of tasks while mountaineering.
Regarding differences in steel, 1095 is a simple carbon steel that's been around for around nearly 100 years. The main reason most companies produce fixed blades with 1095 is because it's a cheap way to mass-produce cutlery of relatively high quality. 154cm is a modern, high alloy stainless steel developed for jet turbine components. Its use in knives was pioneered by knife making legend Bob Loveless because 154cm has a higher carbon content than 1095 and higher chromium content (1095 has none).
For anyone who would like to learn more, there are many good references - some more technical than others. I chose this one because it's accurate, concise, and includes the manufacturers. http://bestpocketknifetoday.com/discovering-the-best-knife-steel/
You can also read more about 154CM using the link below. 1095 is not listed on this site, because it's not considered to be a tool steel. http://www.simplytoolsteel.com/CPM-154-stainless-steel-data-sheet.html
Jun 18, 2016
ISKvery good info! thanks for posting
Jun 18, 2016
View Full Discussion