Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Tsa1
3
May 19, 2019
Thanks for the in-depth. I wish Kershaw would just hire Sanrenmu to do the job for them.
reswright
3850
May 19, 2019
Tsa1LOL! I agree with the principle, and I'll explain why, but sit down and strap in because this'll blow your mind: I'm more than halfway convinced that's exactly what they did. The thing is, when a company like Kershaw hires an overseas OEM to build them a knife, they're subcontracting out their cheapest stuff with the lowest margins and the lowest quality standards. Kershaw has a US manufacturing footprint that isn’t interested in creating skilled competitors overseas, so the work is split like that. Something like the choice of washer is already in the contract. So the OEM is contractually performing work that might not reflect the standards they wish they could be doing. Chinese knife manufacturers are fairly conscious of the effect this has had on their brand in general - when US consumers consistently see only cheap and shoddy things marked Made in China after a while it's natural to conclude that only crappy things get made over there, but people don't realize that's got a lot to do with how Western importers are operating. I think a lot of OEMs are resigned just do contractually ok work for Western brands (all they're being paid to do, after all) as a result... and saving their best effort for the things they release under their own brand. So why do I think it’s SRM? When you look at the Reverb, and then look around at the known Chinese manufacturers, there's really only one that's doing anything similar and that is SRM. This doesn't mean they're the OEM -- it just might mean they were the first and quickest to seize upon the design, right? But in that case, when a Chinese company is cloning the knife you end up with a knife that only looks like the original -- it'll be heavier, all the parts will be a little thicker and simpler, because they're made with less expensive materials. Cloning 101, save money on material cost, replace expensive designs with simpler ones. And we all know about Chinese clone knives that are indeed just that little bit thicker and heavier right? But if it's the OEM of the Western knife that's just capitalizing on their knowledge to release several related but less expensive versions of the knife, you will see the product dimensions staying close with the original, for one main reason -- they want to reuse as much OEM tooling and processes and training as possible, because that's one of the reasons they can be so price competitive. The knife won't just look like the original, it'll actually share some dimensions and manufacturing marks with it. So you'll see knives with a very similar blade, not a thicker one, and they'll bear similar features reflecting the fact that they were made from the same, or very similar tooling, compared to the original knife. And instead of many firms cashing in with a similar clone, you'll see that one firm dominating the niche....as SRM is indeed doing with these little carabiner knives. So also I picked up one of these, which might look a little familiar to you in design.
search
The San Ren Mu 7049-LTX-PH. $14 delivered. In the interests of science I took it apart. And this next picture is the one that tells a thousand words.
search
Two big things. One - where the Reverb had only cheap, chewed up nylon washers that were biting against the stop bar, this one is rocking dual wafer-thin phosphor bronze washers and brass bushing style washers with milled holes to reserve lubricant and reduce friction. If you want to see washers better than that you have to open up a fricking Sebenza. Might be one reason why I can flick this thing open effortlessly, and I still can't flip the Reverb at all unless I loosen the pivot to the point that the blade slants out of true. People who know SRM probably aren't astonished but for everyone else, seeing something that good on a $14 knife really grabs the attention. The second point's the bigger one, though. Look at the blade. See that odd hole? Not the detent hole. The one that's so close to the pivot that regular washers won't fit? The one that doesn't actually line up to anything else in the SRM knife but just happens to be where the stop bar sits on the Reverb blade? That's because I'll bet you anything this blade was built on the same tooling that the Reverb's blade was, and that the hole was originally a guide for the circular track for the stop pin to be subsequently milled in, possibly by hand (it's extremely rounded on the Reverb blade, as the pictures show). There's just no reason for that hole to be there at all otherwise, let alone in precisely the same place. Also, the two blades, both 8Cr14MoV, are the same length, and measured with a micrometer the exact same thickness down to a single micron. Any of these could be the case by coincidence, but all of them together are fairly suggestive -- that sort of odd correspondence doesn't happen by accident. Last pic, showing the overlap between washer and hole. Looks familiar, doesn't it? :)
search
Those washers wouldn't fit if the stop pin were still passing through the tang. Which is probably one reason why SRM moved it. I would have. I thought it was a bad design choice to begin with. So even though this blade has one of SRM's signature grinds on it, and has done away with the fancy CNC milling that was on the Kershaw blade and moved the stop pin out of the tang where it belongs, I end up still leaning toward the idea that SRM was the OEM for the Kershaw Reverb. Can't prove it, but I'd lay a fiver on it. No worries tho. I knew what you meant and I agree with your larger point, and now we have proof of a sort, because when SRM actually does indeed make a similar knife under their own name, it's not just a little better, it's ten times better and six dollars cheaper. And not for nothing? The washers are better than I can find at retail in the US. I can find bearings, racers, bushings, all manner of fittings that are “better”, but neither brass nor PB washers this size and fineness. Speaks for itself.
(Edited)
Tsa1
3
May 22, 2019
reswrightYeah I didn't think that when SRM or another Manufacturer is contracted they just have to do what they are contracted to do and they typically do a better job with their own designs. I debating on picking up one of these as well now! Thanks Again! It was a great read!
fhood
715
May 23, 2019
reswrightThat's one hell of a write up. Thanks for the hard work.
reswright
3850
May 31, 2019
fhoodappreciated. Work isn’t the right word.... it takes time and energy but there’s a nerdish pleasure to sharing the info that makes all this not-work somehow. It’s all data they try to keep behind the curtains usually. I hate facades and like figuring out what lies beneath. Especially these days with all the problems we can’t solve, one I can solve is pleasant medicine.
KT83
17
Jul 16, 2019
reswrightHello Sir, I hope you're doing well and having a great day today. To be honest, I haven't yet read the entire thread, but I must say, it is very refreshing, as encountering a truly intelligent person, in our current societies, has sadly become a "rare phenomenon". A person who dares to "actually THINK", create independent, "unique" opinions, by applying logic and taking on, by challenging "the subconscious programming". No doubt that being different can be a lonely "endeavor of life" , as questioning "the norm" and thus also "challenging it", is/will, by "its" population be perceived as "a threat". People are scared of everything they don't understand, and nothing is as unsatisfying as when you really try to "say" something, but later realize that nobody "heard a word you said", even though they were listening the whole time... still, someone has to use this unique brain of ours, as You implied (I think), the world could use, ..needs some "help", it's in a pretty bad shape. ANYWAY..😄.., I VERY MUCH ENJOY READING YOUR THREADS, THANKS! KT✌
PRODUCTS YOU MAY LIKE
Trending Posts in More Community Picks