achristilaw
105
Jun 3, 2020
bookmark_border
Tried the 789 and shook the head. The amp suffers compression peaks, and has a hardness, with a bit of glare. I have no idea why it's so popular. It's not terrible, just nowhere near great. The hype train was of the bullet train variety. Everybody bought in.
Jun 3, 2020
ds60
77
Jun 4, 2020
bookmark_border
Do you have any graphs or hard numbers to visualize that? I don't have any of the equipment necessary to measure any of that and I think it sounds great. Definitely one of the best amps I've owned (that doesn't cost 2-3x or more) https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/review-and-measurements-of-massdrop-thx-aaa-789-amp.5001/ The new Topping A90 seems like an example of what could be better: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/topping-a90-headphone-amplifier-review.13592/
(Edited)
Jun 4, 2020
Rajkoothrapallee
23
Jun 5, 2020
bookmark_border
That’s how it’s in on the recording. Your typical normal audiophool amps just smoothens hides everything and it may appear subjectively better to you. But the quality of hi quality recording and a lower quality recording different bit rates /sample rates be much evident on this than your typical audiophool amp. I have a Lehmann audio linear pro, which in comparison is also less transparent as a tool than this one. But it’s easy to listen on that amp with every music. My headphones are hd 800, not the best, but decent.
Jun 5, 2020
achristilaw
105
Jun 5, 2020
bookmark_border
Not a fan of the 800 at all. That 6~K peak would be like running ice picks in and out the ears using the THX, for me anyway. The 789 is neutralish. I have the Gilmore Dynamid and Dynahi that are more neutral, have a wider bandwidth and both are offering a better dynamic. The Sangaku is more open, fluid and has more insight. With a very homogeneous presentation. Better detail. The 789 is good for the money. Just not the highly touted end gamer the net has portrayed.
Jun 5, 2020
achristilaw
105
Jun 5, 2020
bookmark_border
Hold on to your hat. There has never been a single measurement to totally explain how something sounds. The synergy, when two or more components combine to rise above the station, can't be guessed at. It just happens. That's what makes a system sing. For me? The 789 has a bit of grain and glare that works with some phones and doesn't with others. The dynamic (macro) is stunted (IMO). Good amp for the money. Should be in the talk for "best buy" at its new low price. The best measurement devices are on the side of your head. If it can walk your soul to musics edge? Whats to complain about?
Jun 5, 2020
ds60
77
Jun 6, 2020
bookmark_border
If you're talking signal compression then that is very much observable in the numbers. As for the other stuff, when people say "grain" that usually signals to me "faster response and possibly more accurate" in better-than-entry-level gear, and I have never been able to figure out what "glare" is. (if you have a quantifier for that I'd be appreciative, no one I've asked has given a good explanation) I go by the numbers first, and when I find something affordable with both good stats and reviews, I then judge for myself. Last time the numbers weren't available and I only went by what people said, I got burned.
(Edited)
Jun 6, 2020
mosquitoguy
34
Jun 6, 2020
bookmark_border
The compression peaks is probably related to your source, and most likely your headphone as well. You notice it because the 789 is very transparent, so it sounds 'great' or 'meh' depending on the combo.
Jun 6, 2020
achristilaw
105
Jun 7, 2020
bookmark_border
Bel Canto's 3.7 and VBL 1, or exaSound's e38 for dacs. exaSound sigma streamer or Bluesound's Node 2i for sources. I use vinyl and silver disc's for sound rooms. Quite a few of the 789's are on the used market. Most people use this with the $189 dollar dacs. The AKG 812's and 872's. Final's IV, VI and VIII. If you listening to the soft and loping Sennheiser 6xx you'd be fine. Not a planar fan. Too soft in the middle and attic for my taste. The Audeze would work well with the amp. Hide some of the sins. I prefer acoustic music. Classical and jazz to blues and bluegrass.
Jun 7, 2020
jaydunndiddit
3228
Jun 7, 2020
bookmark_border
What headphones do you own and use with the 789? That would shed a lot of light into what you're hearing. I know myself, and many others, don't hear any "glare" or "grain" from the 789, let alone distortion or noise. That sounds like a source, power, or headphone problem. I'm willing to bet more of the latter. The 789 is true to whatever it's fed; nothing more and nothing less. Some may want their sound reproduction to be more editorialized, but the 789 is true to the source as it's essentially "wire with gain." Also something you said prior, "The best measurement devices are on the side of your head." That's a very untrue statement as our human ears are some of the worst devices for gauging accurate sound. They're pretty flawed and wholly inconsistent.
Jun 7, 2020
ds60
77
Jun 8, 2020
bookmark_border
My listening preferences make my coworker's ears bleed, so there is truth to your statement. Reproducible, concrete statistics; what sounds "good" to a listener; and what is most common along the spectrum of human hearing are all quite divergent topics. I was mostly interested in the former. What sounds "good" is less immediately relevant, and as I said I ultimately judge for myself anyway. I also don't listen to vinyl, all digital studio recordings for me.
(Edited)
Jun 8, 2020
Rajkoothrapallee
23
Jun 8, 2020
bookmark_border
I don’t know about the headphones you mentioned. Nor I can find any measurements for that. Unless I see them through since I know what I want , I won’t be interesyed in it even if it’s high end marketed stuff. To me with the available measurments thx is a very good product which produces transparency to hear the artists intention. I am not interested on any flavor on the top of it. Hate tubes for this reason
Jun 8, 2020
nottheseapples
8
Jun 23, 2020
bookmark_border
But when it comes to an amp like this, wont harsh sound depend on the dac?
Jun 23, 2020
achristilaw
105
Jun 23, 2020
bookmark_border
Your working under the assumption that the amp has no faults. That it is supremely neutral, and anything untoward in playback must be the fault of the preceding chain. That's not the case (IMO). The last couple months have you noticed? That all the "reviewers" have quietly moved along and are plugging into other amps?
Jun 23, 2020
ds60
77
Jun 29, 2020
bookmark_border
Probably because THX is already working on the next lineup of amps based on newer technology...
Jun 29, 2020
Jasonq997
0
Jul 11, 2020
bookmark_border
This is basically correct and has been proven via measurements.
Jul 11, 2020
Rajkoothrapallee
23
Jul 20, 2020
bookmark_border
There is no measurement avaialable on the dacs you mentioned . Mostly that will be the source of your glare;)
Jul 20, 2020
Rajkoothrapallee
23
Jul 20, 2020
bookmark_border
I did not notice anyone simply discarding that amp but since new things come up, they need to review them too. Not even a single instead I saw when some reviewer simply said it’s terrible and I am moving to something else. Your dac and headphones must be the problem.
Jul 20, 2020
mrcrunch08
143
Dec 31, 2020
bookmark_border
I'm sorry but I call bs. "Compression peaks" would show on graphs and the graphs don't show any and none of the thx amps I have heard has any "hardness" either though who knows what that even means. The only issue with peaks of any kind has to do with clipping while running xlr inputs. I have yet to hear an amp in the $300 price range that is as clean or as smooth as the 789 and nearly every measurement and reviewer seem to agree.
Dec 31, 2020
ds60
77
Jan 6, 2021
bookmark_border
You experience signal clipping with balanced inputs? I don't.
Jan 6, 2021
mrcrunch08
143
Jan 6, 2021
bookmark_border
It's there by default. Even the people who made it has said it is recommended not to exceed 2nd gain when using 4v xlr balanced inputs. It's in the discussion thread here.
Jan 6, 2021
ds60
77
Jan 6, 2021
bookmark_border
Well I stick to gain 1 and 2 so that's why :)
Jan 6, 2021
View Full Discussion
Trending Posts in Audiophile
keithrosier
About to receive my replacement Focal Elex and worried about quality
My original Elex left driver went out 10 months in. The replacement is soon to be delivered. I'm worried that the same thing will happen to the replacement at some point. I've ordered the upcoming Drop HD-8xx hoping that it will usable for me like the Elex has been. With the Drop HD-8xx the inherent lift in the highs of the HD 800's has been partially dealt with and some lows added. I honestly don't like hyped treble when using headphones. I'm hoping that there is an open back phone that is somewhat linear like the Elex, and has a similar sonic signature. I don't want another headphone from Focal; just can't deal with this again. What non-Focal linear open back headphone easily competes with the Elex?
Jul 30, 2021
General
piomar
What to do with one side dead (Focal Elex)?
I have a pair of focal elex headphones. By far one of the best I've had but one side went dead yesterday. Not the cable issue and read that it is common with them. Could you advise what to do? Can it be fixed locally? Given it right be the driver or copper cable inside?
Jul 29, 2021
Questions
Jaycc
THX AAA 789 Amazing sound
Online reviews spoke highly, but I was suprised by the detail in the sound. I was using a Dac/amp with an msrp of 1400 so I did not expect much. I did notice an immediate clarity improvement. Music, specifically words were no longer blurred.Singers seemed to make more of an effort to enunciate words more. Even using a $100 DAC the sound was top notch. Drop hit a home run with this product.
Jul 29, 2021
General
dioporks
Photos
HD 6XX + Pioneer XDP300
Jul 29, 2021
recycledcans
Clamping forces of Drop-collaborated headphones
I have a fat wide head and am sensitive to the clamping force of headphones. My question is, why are the clamping forces of Drop headphones reportedly higher than the ones from the original manufacturer? For example, according to measured tests on rtings.com, both the Sennheiser HD5xx, HD58x, and HD6xx have much higher clamping force than their respective Sennheiser original models. This also seems to ring true with the Drop x Meze 99 headphones, where Meze 99 forums are saying there's almost no clamping force but the some on the Drop forum are saying the collab version's clamping force were "quite high." Is Drop requesting that headbands be tighter on the collab versions? What's going on? Also, can anyone suggest me a comfortably wide/large headphones? I'm currently using AKG 7xx and they're super comfortable.
Jul 29, 2021
Questions
sa6o
Photos
Unconventional pair but still love it
Jul 28, 2021
Juantunez
Roon endpoint
Is there any product under development to provide the community with a Roon endpoint?
Jul 28, 2021
Interest Checks