There Are Pandas, and Then There Are Pandas.
And this isn't either of them! The Pandas we're talking about here, are watches, not bears. And what got me thinking about them (again) was a link posted this morning by @cm.rook who pointed a few of us to the very attractive (and not terribly priced) Yema "Rallygraph" Panda which, in it's most traditional arrangement, looks like the one on the left, but can also be had in the version on the right: The model on the left is a true Panda, while the model on the right is called a reverse Panda. The reason for that distinction is clear--Panda bears, only come in the first arrangement. Now at this point, everyone should be thinking about the most well-know Panda, The Rolex Panda, which is actually a Daytona, and among Rolex Daytonas, the most famous of which is the Paul Newman Daytona, which was famous first, because it was Paul's, and second because it sold at auction for $17.8 million (US Dollars). The story of that auction is well-known so I'll only...
Nov 8, 2019
The specs:
Size: B5-ish (250x175mm)
Count: 96 sheets, 192 pages
Weight: 140gsm, yes 140!
Ruling: 5mm grid (also available in 6mm lines and blank)
Binding: Smyth-sewn, with cardboard covers
The notebook is hand made, and it shows. Not entirely in a good way, though. The cardboard covers (a rather ugly affair) are somewhat warped and the spine is duct tape. The design, I guess, aims to be simple and plain like the Midori MD. The Midori, however, comes out looking refined and elegant. tBoR comes out looking cheap.
The paper looks very smooth, no apparent texturing visible to the naked eye. However, it is not glossy by any means and its not smooth to the touch. Probably the highest feedback I got from any FP-friendly paper ever. This one will make your fountain pens sing.
So how does it fare against the likes of Clairefontaine and Tomoe River?
To find out I used
2- a Pelikan no.mistake to test erase and overwrite;
3- a Levenger L-Tech, F nib, filled with Diamine Onyx black, an offensively juicy combination;
4- a Pilot Prera, M nib, filled with Seitz-Kreuznach Tomatenrot;
5- a Sharpie | pen;
6- a document-grade Schneider One Business with a nasty habit of feathering and bleeding through most paper;
7- a Schneider Slider Rave XB, because every test needs a ballpoint;
and
X- Inkzilla.
Inkzilla may look like a run-of-the-mill 6mm Pilot Parallel pen, cocooned within it, however, is an ancient cartridge that, even though it has never been used, is less than a third full. Pilot Parallel ink is already dense as it is, concentrated like this... its paper cryptonite. And yet the pen started writing right away. Well, it spoke first, something about becoming death and destroying paper worlds, but then it just kept on writing. Pilot, right?
For comparison I tried
- Taroko 68gsm Tomoe River, 5mm grid;
- Fabriano Ecoqua 85gsm, 5mm grid;
- Transotype Sensebook 80gsm, 5mm grid;
and
- Muji Recycled 80gsm, 5mm grid.
I considered including TWSBI, Stalogy, Leuchturm and Apica Premium too, but I need something to live for. You don't want to uncover the secrets of the universe in one go.
Due to considerations of space and to keep things as uniform as possible I went with a minimal single writing sample (Book of Ra) for all pens on all types of paper. The 2nd line, like the 1st, is written using the Al-Star with "Book" erased and overwritten with the no.mistake (note: forgot to do this for the Taroko).
For the EF nib of the Al-Star all 6 paper brands are perfectly adequate, even the last three which are not explicitly marketed as FP-friendly. Closer inspection with the loupe reveals some fine feathering for those. What also becomes apparent and what the photos do not show very well is that the lines on wolf paper are noticeably cleaner and better defined than any other paper, even the Clairefontaine and the Tomoe River. In practice, however, that is utterly irrelevant, as you really can't tell with the naked eye. We are approaching audiophile-levels of obsession here. See lines 3 and 4 for a more apparent difference.
The best performer in the overwrite test is easily Clairefontaine, followed closely by Tomoe River (done post-photo). Wolf paper failed the overwrite test, with some significant feathering visible. This may have something to do with the multiple passes the eraser required for it to work on this paper. Maybe I was impatient.
In summary, I can say with some confidence that Wolf paper lives up to Sirius's Domain's claims and that their own sample below matches what I have found.
Is it better than Clairefontaine? I'd have to say No!
Yes, it does perform better; the lines are cleaner and better defined, even less feathering, zero bleed-through, etc etc. In practice, though, you'd be hard-pressed to tell the difference. You will notice the 140gsm thickness, however, and you will most certainly notice the feedback.
Now... who makes this paper?