Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions

It's official-ish

more_vert
3
6
remove_red_eye
78
RayF
22214

search
close
Hard to imagine how it couldn't. It's a7 predecessors are already superb.
TherocThat said, if I had $2K to spend on a camera, I'd scrape together another $1K and get the a7R III.
TherocOn 2nd thought, no I would not. I'd get the a7 III even if I had $3000 to spare. I'd spend the difference on glass. As awesome as the a7R III is, I don't need 48M pixels.
yanjay
9
May 24, 2018
Sony recently hosted an event at my local camera store(Michael's @ Melbourne Australia). I managed to get my hands on a A7III with the 24-70 F2.8 G Master out for a walk. I agree that it is the best value you can get at the 2000 price range. It definite gives you the most features compare to its competitors. If I have the budget, I would not hesitate buying it.
RyCan
144
May 16, 2018
I would think that if it is the best camera you would want to get shot with it. Unless you are really photo shy.
RayF
22214
May 16, 2018
RyCanI prefer to be behind the camera; you on the other hand, should definitely stand over there, by the wall...
Related Posts
Trending Posts in More Community Picks