Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Another option for comparison, will need an assistant to make the test blind: http://www.2l.no/hires/
There is also another link I can't find at the moment, the same master(s) was/were encoded into 44.1khz 16 bit, 96khz 24 bit and 192 khz 24-bit. When I get home I will track it down and post it as well. I've never felt that the difference was dramatic between lossy and lossless encoding as well as cd-quality lossless and hi-res. Any difference is highly dependent on the original source recording and many tracks yield no benefit to my ears in high resolution or lossless levels. I've done several tests with friends using some of the aforementioned files and some can tell the difference while others cannot.
PRODUCTS YOU MAY LIKE
Trending Posts in Audiophile