Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions

Personally I'm surprised the casio rangeman is there. while it is functional. It does not look good. That said not all casio's are ugly. I just think most of the digital ones are. The twincept (ana-digi) look good. the Mrg looks good but at over 3k? But personally I would not spend more than 300 on a watch.
Any watch over $2,000 seems to be purchasing a name on the dial. How much better can a watch be? Obviously watches made of precious metals deserve a high price based on materials, but if you just want a great watch, why spend more? There are so many better ways to spend your money, IMHO. I will probably never spend more than $500 on a watch my self.
C’mon, guys, let’s get realistic here. You will NEVER see a legitimate Rolex drop on this site. As a brand, Rolex strictly controls their distribution and retail channels. If you see a drop here, be prepared to take the risk of paying $3-$4K for a well crafted fake worth about $200.00 and made in Hong Kong.
Rolex factory warranty on Massdrop?!? HA HA HA HA! You *must* be high.
Of course the obvious winner is the SpongeBob LCD watch guys
Squidsid15
0
Nah man, clearly it's the Audeze headphones, although they keep sliding off my wrist...
If no one can bother to fix the Title I can't be bothered voting
Rolex Submariners are boring and overpriced, admitted their well built work horses with a rich history in the military and the famous but they have become complacent. Other brands provide much more for your money. It's never a good thing when a brand feels their hype status means they don't need to try.
Load 1 more comment
😂precisely
What brand would you recommend that has more bang for your buck? Honestly asking!
well, since I don't have any of those in my collection.... I'll just be over here eating popcorn.
The Patek Philippe 6002G is a bit of a joke. It's one of those, "If I ever can afford it, I will" picks. We now return you to your regularly-scheduled discussion.
I think the poll should have separated into different price category, too many to choose from here, who made this poll, so stupid.
jackl
0
Well, the typical massdrop poll type :( People are just throwing items for the sake of adding something.
I still don't understand which own watch I need to own?
If it's just one watch, period, end of discussion, then the list should be primarily constructed of classics, icons and newer popular watches. I suggest the Junghans Max Bill Chronograph as my single piece. Versatile, practical and affordable to many.
What de fuck is this Rolex trash i want the Spongebob watch that is a high quality device
After reading some of the comments, and at risk of sounding like a jerk, I think it would be better to ask for watches at a specific price point. I am a "Watch Geek".  I own and wear everything from Invicta's and  Deep Blue's  all the way up to a Vacheron Constantine. ( Hey that was the name of some long dead Pope or Roman Emperor... what you trying to pull).
  I have a number of "One Watches to Own" at different price points. There is a very hard to find Invicta that is sub 1k price I have been trying to find to replace one that was stolen. The same goes for a World of Watches offering I kept putting of buying. And there is a specific Alpina I want to find at the right price.
  There is an Oris Frank Sinatra special edition that had 3 different offerings and I only have two. It is in the 2k-2,5k price range. And I never got the "Dizzy Gilespie" special edition that, last time I was looking, is a bit under 2k.
   There is a specific   Baume and Mercier and a new Maurice Lacroix with their new in-house movement in the 3-5 k range.
   There is a Rolex quartz that is even rarer than the one I own, that I would love to find. ( Yes, even Rolex gave in to making a few quartz during the "Quartz Revolution" in the 1970's.  Used, it is still closer to the 5k range due to rarity.) And of course a specific Omega Planet Ocean. that is actually "non Bond" connected. At least till Craig's next movie for now. And there is the new Panerai with a sapphire window case back to see the movement I have been trying to trade my older Special Edition non sapphire case back for, ( And NOT involving  my Panerai concierge either. That is to big of a hit price wise.)
   The 10-15k range  would be a specific Rolex Deep Sea and a Patek I want.
    PLEASE, don NOT take this as bragging or a "Look what I have." post. I have over 35 years plus of collecting watches. Too, a number of my watches are technically second hand or trade-ins if you will from a very trusted jeweler friend.  Some came from auctions  and have been verified authentic and serviced. I am just trying to point out- Would it not b better to set a price point and go from there for a Drop?     I respectfully offer this alternative to all of you. And , if you think I am full of it or don't get the concept, feel free to let me know please?  I mean NO disrespect.
   John.
  P.S. > For what it is worth, there are MANY watches  at a lot of Rolex's price points that surpass Rolex. Rolex's claim to fame is really that they know HOW to market their name. Some years back, Rolex even surpassed the tennis shoe big names for a marketing budget. Yes, Rolex has had many "firsts",  and they DO make a good watch, just not at many of their price points in my opinion. But the average person has no clue of that. People mostly know that Rolex is the "ideal" luxury watch because of seeing billboards and advertisements in magazines telling them so. ( Please note I state this when I own two of them also. One with only a 36mm bezel I will not trade off.)    EDIT>   I should have stated I didn't count the quartz model as it is not truly a consideration today other than the used market.
JohnGOhio
0
Boring
tagheuer carrera 16 daydate please
The idea of ever seeing a Rolex on Massdrop... lol.