Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 49 conversations about:
Mbot
191
May 6, 2018
bookmark_border
Only 50m water resistant. Pathetic. It should have been 100m minimum
shooteur
121
May 7, 2018
bookmark_border
MbotIt's also a Chronograph, 5ATM is pretty much chrono standard, see the Omega Speedy.
Mbot
191
May 8, 2018
bookmark_border
JiayawShame on Patek Philippe! 100m water resistance is not extreme, it is average, quite the norm actually.
It is almost inconceivable that multi-thousand dollar watches are 3ATM/5ATM while $150/$200 watches have 10ATM.
My Tissot SeaStar cost only $699 and has 300m water resistance including a screwdown crown!
It is almost inconceivable that multi-thousand dollar watches are 3ATM/5ATM while $150/$200 watches have 10ATM.
My Tissot SeaStar cost only $699 and has 300m water resistance including a screwdown crown!
sockpuppy
451
May 8, 2018
bookmark_border
MbotThis watch has to hold a movement that's twice the thickness as your SeaStar, and 20% larger diameter, in the same size case, with only 1/3 the number of places that water can work its way into.
Erik1
255
May 11, 2018
bookmark_border
MbotIt's not a dive watch. "Should be 1000m minimum" Minimum? What non dive watch has more than 100m resistance? 75% of watches over $150 have 100m? What a crock of bullshit. It's a dressy chronograph. You don't like it, buy what you like. Why so belligerent to reasonable responses. Why would you even need 10 ATM on a non Diver? 5 ATM is fine for swimming if you feel you must, but if you want to dive, get a dicver, not a dressy non-diver chrono. Only noobs from a shanty town have to rely on only one watch for all purposes.
Drop Refurbished
Like-new products you can trustDrop Rewards
Get $5 for every 500 points you earn! Learn more
Drop Keyboard Club
Become a member and expand your keycap collectionCollaborate With Us
For Brands & DesignersFollow Drop