Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 23 conversations about:
ludachris
314
Feb 6, 2017
bookmark_border
Massdrop if you're reading this. You'll sell more watches from 38mm to 41mm guaranteed. Anything greater than 43mm won't sell a lot. Please listen to this advice. Not everyone is into huge hockey puck on wrists. Thank you
Feb 6, 2017
A community member
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
ludachrisAnd not everyone is into tiny baby watches. I know this might come as a surprise but the world does not actually revolve around you.
Aug 31, 2017
Imba08
15
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
unless youre 50kgs overweight anything over 42mm is definately too big
Aug 31, 2017
Aleskb
449
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
Definitely true, reason why there needs to be both proposed! But: - Massdrop seems to propose more and more 44mm+ watches versus less and less smaller ones (40 or 42 is by no mean a baby's watch by the way!) - It also is a fact that a 40 or 42 is more versatile and fits more wrists of different sizes than a 48, which will only fit 10% of wrists out there! ;)
Aug 31, 2017
A community member
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
Imba08Nah, mate. Just better genetics. Sorry if you don't have people over 5' tall where ever you are.
Aug 31, 2017
ludachris
314
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
Height has nothing to do with wrist size. 38mmsize was ideal size for men its been around for 50 years until now. 40mm is the now the new ideal size for men. If you need something bigger on your wrist to make up for your small needs. I totally understand the world evolves around you. Thanks for your input and ur intelligent reference on genetics and how watch markets target people like you.
Aug 31, 2017
ludachris
314
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
Imba08Thats the typical guy who thinks bigger is better obviously. I agree anything over 42mm is big.
Aug 31, 2017
A community member
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
ludachrisYou sure seem very defensive about having limp wrists. There are plenty of great women's watches you could wear.
Aug 31, 2017
ludachris
314
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
You seem to lost something down there. I cant help you with that maybe a doctor can. Sorry for your loss.
Aug 31, 2017
A community member
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
ludachrisIt's okay, bud. If 38 used to be fine and then it was 40, I'm sure some day your genetic line will catch up with the rest of the developed world. Just don't blame us for being ahead of the curve.
Aug 31, 2017
Aleskb
449
Aug 31, 2017
bookmark_border
ludachrisWhy do you even bother replying? Shagatron is obviously a bored troll who found a willing target to kill his spare time. Just leave it and he'll move on to someone else ;)
Aug 31, 2017
ludachris
314
Sep 1, 2017
bookmark_border
AleskbI agree Shagatron is a troll. Thank you
Sep 1, 2017
MswmSwmsW
125
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
Imba08dude, i disagree . I'm 6'2", 185lbs i have a very wide wrist. I'm not overweight at all. it measures over 2.5"across and just under 8"around. it isn't always about being overweight.
watches smaller than about 42 look SMALL on me. 45mm looks just about perfect.
Sep 4, 2017
Imba08
15
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
MswmSwmsWnah you just have bad taste
Sep 4, 2017
MswmSwmsW
125
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
Imba08really? speedmaster grey side of the Moon and sinn U1 are examples of bad taste?
Sep 4, 2017
View Full Discussion