BrainFlushBrainFlush has clearly flushed his brain. Evidence: the brain-dead comment above.
Clearly this product is not of interest to you, yet it's not enough to simply move along. BrainFlush decided to drop a political post instead.
Some are sheep; some are shepherds. This vest is for those of us who prefer the God-given freedom of self protection in a dangerous world. If you prefer to be helpless, that's fine. Move along, please.
Have a nice day.
thegreatdaneI'm all for protecting ones self and family and property etc.
But when the statistics speak volumes of how badly managed gun rights are, how wrong can dead bodies be?
But yeah. I'm an idiot.
Don't forget to lock your bunker door. ;)
BrainFlushLet's manage the psychos rather than the fundamental right of self-protection. The tragic events you reference were absolutely stomach-turning, awful. We're in agreement to stop these atrocities. We only differ in the means of doing so.
For those who choose to responsibly exercise our 2nd amendment, we recognize the benefit of being equally armed. Please don't threaten our ability to do so. With great freedom comes great responsibility, and there are millions of responsibly armed citizens in the US. It's the deranged that are the problem.
Last comment since we're clearly at an impasse (and not the purpose of this board). Take care.
thegreatdaneI agree in better methods of filtering out the lunatics. Just as I think our method of giving a driver's license to every idiot old enough to drive should change.
Take care.
thegreatdaneI don't think he started the political discussion...
And whenever you have to attack the commenter rather than the comment, you've already lost IMO.
BrainFlushYou act like you are responsible because you state "...statistics speak loudly..." In fact, you don't know what you are talking about. The most rigorous studies of gun-related deaths consistently say something different. How do I know? I have read almost all of the most-cited studies. Plus, meta-studies (statistical analysis of the studies) indicate that all the anti-gun "studies" are terribly executed. Having said that, I request that the community refrain from political posturing. This is not a forum for political debate.
I'm sorry for my part, but I simply couldn't let a blatant misrepresentation stand.
I have a couple items by Rothco,and think highly of them. I simply can't accept that this item is also good based on the description. I will need to find user reviews to make a better assessment.