It's official-ish
more_vert
thumb_upTheroc, Duncan, and 1 other
3
6
remove_red_eye
76
RayF
22295

search
close
Theroc
2166
May 25, 2018
Hard to imagine how it couldn't. It's a7 predecessors are already superb.
Theroc
2166
May 26, 2018
That said, if I had $2K to spend on a camera, I'd scrape together another $1K and get the a7R III.
Theroc
2166
Jun 7, 2018
On 2nd thought, no I would not. I'd get the a7 III even if I had $3000 to spare. I'd spend the difference on glass. As awesome as the a7R III is, I don't need 48M pixels.
yanjay
9
May 24, 2018
Sony recently hosted an event at my local camera store(Michael's @ Melbourne Australia). I managed to get my hands on a A7III with the 24-70 F2.8 G Master out for a walk. I agree that it is the best value you can get at the 2000 price range. It definite gives you the most features compare to its competitors. If I have the budget, I would not hesitate buying it.
RyCan
121
May 16, 2018
I would think that if it is the best camera you would want to get shot with it. Unless you are really photo shy.
RayF
22295
May 16, 2018
I prefer to be behind the camera; you on the other hand, should definitely stand over there, by the wall...