Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
dannys
9
Jun 8, 2016
This sucks. I want to have the 1070. the 480 is an AMD, HELL NO. i already have an oven.
yuusen
6
Jun 8, 2016
dannysgtx fanboy much?
dannys
9
Jun 8, 2016
yuusenWhat a sentence. No not a fanboy of GTX but of nvidia. But AMD Graphics cards are always getting to hot. Cant deny that.
Lrw54321
6
Jun 9, 2016
dannysThey have the same TDP though - 150W; and while you do indeed need 2 RX 480s to match up to and possibly exceed a GTX 1080 in performance, the truth is that most people are happy with GTX 970-980 level performance and will only run a single card anyway.
dannys
9
Jun 10, 2016
Lrw54321So a single RX 480 is to weak as a "single" card option (for me)
yuusen
6
Jun 10, 2016
dannysI agree they have a heating issue when they over clock but thus can outperform nvidia at low price point when they over clock IF you countroll heating, I've owned both brands and it comes down to budget tbh
SneakyPasta
14
Jun 13, 2016
Lrw54321I think the price differential between FreeSync (AMD) and Gsync (Nvidia) may drive people to getting AMD cards.
dannys
9
Jun 13, 2016
SneakyPastaI think if ppl dont have an oven they can buy an AMD card. Now serious. The AMD in general stopped with making high-end GPU's bcs they cant beat NVidia on that ground. So smart of them to play how they do right now. But my preference would be NVidia because of the power and that i dont need a second oven.
romenjelly
3
Jun 14, 2016
dannysMy Sapphire r9 380 nitro is very quiet, and does not get even remotely hot to throttle. My case has bad airflow too, no front fan, only one on the side and one on the back. Granted it gets somewhat loud at a 100% load stress test, but no games made it go so far, probably due to my CPU bottleneck.
dannys
9
Jun 14, 2016
romenjellyIts just a saying. In comparesing to NVidia is an AMD freaking hot. Which CPU do you have?
Lrw54321
6
Jun 14, 2016
dannysThe 980 Ti has a TDP of 250W, 100W more than the 480. I assume you think it's a furnace then?
Face it, you're just another Nvidia fanboy.
dannys
9
Jun 14, 2016
Lrw54321Watts has nothing to do with heat... Dumb comment. Im no fanboy, im just realistic. i need power and no heat so i go for the NVidia, sorry boy
romenjelly
3
Jun 14, 2016
dannysYeah it is true that NVidia manages to pull off more graphical horsepower in a lower amount of Watts. But we will see how it turns out in this generation, hopefully competition will rise when AMD releases Vega & Navi.
defrich52
2
Jun 15, 2016
dannysthey are appealing to affordable cost now and I would buy two of them. I am not a fan boy but who has $600 to $700 to shell out.
dannys
9
Jun 15, 2016
defrich52Im also not a fanboy. Just realistic in what i pick for my needs. I explain how i think of it.
Lrw54321
6
Jun 16, 2016
dannysWATTAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HEAT?
DAMN MAN, WHERE DOES THE HEAT COME FROM THEN? YOUR ASS?
I see now that you're either an idiot or a troll. Either way, I won't waste any more of my time with this conversation
dannysNice try shilling Nvidia danny, but Nvidia's GTX 1080 Ripoff's Edition actually throttles at stock settings. No need to be an a*****e and lie about temperature problems. Do you want a monopoly? You know Nvidia cards will be cheaper too if AMD is competitive, right?
dannysYou have a serious problem. Please stop commenting on here, nobody wants to hear your input if it's not going to be constructive. The RX 480 is looking like fantastic card that does not run hot and offers solid performance for not very much money. I call that successful.
Tmdz
2
Jun 16, 2016
dannysYou must have failed science class if you think watts has nothing to do with heat......
dannys
9
Jun 16, 2016
TmdzIf i look to the difference of watts of the NVidia card and AMD card then the AMD is freaking hot. thats the statement i make. But clearly there are many AMD fan by in here
dannys
9
Jun 16, 2016
DigitalFruitcake24Problem no, im just realistic in what i WANT and NEED and explain it but all the MAD fan boys are sensetive as !*#^%@
Tmdz
2
Jun 16, 2016
dannysNo you literally said "Watts has nothing to do with heat" that is what I'm referring to. Obviously watts is the only thing that generates heat in a electrical device.
The past Ati cards do run hot and they do consumes a substantial amount of watts above the nvidia cards. But the new model is right on par with nvidia in terms of watts or even lower consumption. To make a statement about it consuming more or being a "heater" makes you a nvidia fan boy when you judge a product before it is even released.
deezy129
7
Jun 18, 2016
TmdzI can not wait to be running 2 x RX 480s and all the Nvidia fan boys here bragging how they would rather pay nearly twice the price for essentially the same performance so they don't have an "oven" or a "toaster" can have fun blowing extra cash for no reason. Besides the cost of the card G-Sync is also going to cost you a good bit extra meaning in terms of cost to performance for a fantastic 4k gaming system Nvidia is not even in the same state.
GTX 1080: $800 32" G- Sync 60Hz 4K Monitor: $1200
Total: $2000
2 x RX-480 8 GB $500 40" FreeSync 60Hz 4K Monitor $600
Total: $1100 and its actually possible to do at less then $1000 total going with the 4GB version and getting the current discount on Amazon for the screen.
For $1000 you can liquid cool everything in your case and get room to over clock higher only furthering beating Nvidia while staying at the same total price point.
The numbers tell the story as to why the only thing the AMD bashers can do is scream about heat in a card that no one has ever even seen. Will two cards produce more heat than one? Of course it will. Does that mean you are better off spending double the price to save a few degrees of ambient room temperature that you will not even notice unless you are gaming in the hall closet? Well that's up to you but keep your very flawed opinion to yourself.
Signed, Soon to be running Crossfire RX-480s and laughing at the Nvidia Fanboys.
SneakyPasta
14
Jun 20, 2016
deezy129well said brother
CallMePickle
1
Jun 20, 2016
deezy129I thought the 480's price wasn't released yet? Where are you getting those numbers from? I thought the 480 was confirmed to be slower than a single 1070? Why are you comparing the 480 with the 1080? Compare it with the 1070, which is $380.
From my quick google searches, everything seems to say that the 1070s beat the 480s by a good amount.
Also, could you link me to a good $600 60hz 4K freesync 40'' monitor that has preferably 2ms or less delay? I've been looking for a good one.
Signed, Someone who is still running an i3-2120 and a R9 270x.
deezy129
7
Jun 20, 2016
CallMePickleThe 4GB version has been set at an MSRP of $199 which is what I am going off of. This was announced at computex I believe. The price for the 8GB version has not been released but most rumors put it between $230 and $250.
Indeed a single RX480 is well out performed but most of the talk is on 2 x RX480 in a crossfire setup which is pretty much dead even with the 1080. Everyone is making a big deal out of that because of the significant price difference for 2 very equal setups.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01CSC2P0K/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I just got this screen 2 weeks ago and absolutely love it. I am not sure what the exact delay is but I feel no input lag. There are tons of sites that have been picking this up to do reviews thanks to the explosion of popularity with these Korean panels.
I actually paid roughly $550 thanks to 5% off with the Amazon store card. They shipped it from Seoul South Korea on a Friday and it was at my door on Monday.
CallMePickle
1
Jun 20, 2016
deezy129On that monitor, it says "Recommended : Nvidia GTX960 2GB" down near the specs. Also the delay is 5ms which isn't too bad. I'm kinda hesitant to buy it due to what it recommends since I'm getting the 480... Thoughts? I appreciate your help, btw.
deezy129
7
Jun 20, 2016
CallMePickle960 is just a baseline for what you will need to push 4k out. For example while I am waiting on the 480 release I am still on my old gtx 750 as I already sold my previous card before the prices fell too much. Bear in mind that to game in 4k @ 60hz you are very likely going to need 2 RX480s to be able to do so on newer games without using the lowest settings. As for videos, movies, and basic computer stuff a single RX480 will definitely work for you just make sure you get a top of the line DisplayPort cable as the cheaper / older ones do not have the bandwidth throughput to run 4k @ 60hz.
CallMePickle
1
Jun 20, 2016
deezy129Oh shit gaming in 4K with a single 480 would be pushing it? My computer only has room/slots for 1 GPU... Shit.... Well thanks for pointing out a huge flaw in my setup.... Though I will say my main focus is videos/movies, I was hoping to game here and there...
deezy129
7
Jun 20, 2016
CallMePickleIf you are only casually gaming you could easily drop the resolution in game. The 480 should run fine at like 2560 x 1440 @ 60 - 80hz and the set I linked you should handle it just fine as well. I would recommend starting out with a single 480 before you get into anything crazy and see if you are happy with the results. With AM4 on the way you can always upgrade to a bigger system fairly cheap.
If you are looking to game in 4k as well and have the PCI slots open but the card will not fit you could always use a PCI extender with risers. While these have next to no effect on performance in shorter lengths the figuring out card placement could be a bit tricky. I have actually been doing a good amount of research on PCI extenders because when the AM4 boards come out I plan on doing a full wall mounted PC.
This thread gives some pretty good insight into them:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1427731/pci-express-extender-cables-benchmarked
Skullbunny
230
Jun 25, 2016
CallMePickle34" , 60 hz , QHD ; https://www.massdrop.com/buy/lg-34-freesync-1440p-21-9-monitor-34um88c-p
and totally unrelated - https://www.massdrop.com/buy/nixeus-24-144hz-freesync-led-gaming-monitor
One of the better 24" 1080p 144hz FreeSync monitors out there.
For gaming you may really want to find a 144hz monitor.