Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
toniidesu
320
Jan 25, 2020
checkVerified Buyer
I'd been curious about these cult classics ever since I first read about them, so I joined the 2018 drop for the removable cable version but got cold feet and canceled because I was afraid of eating ~$500 on something I couldn't return. I then felt buyer's remorse remorse and lurked Drop for the next year hoping they'd pop back up, and last November they did, albeit in a fixed-cable variant. For anyone else who's on the fence, I'm glad I got these! For perspective, I've owned the following over-ear headphones (cracks knuckles): Audio-Technica M40X and M50; Sennheiser HD598, 600, and 650; Philips Fidelio L2, Fostex T50RP Mk3, Oppo PM-3, Sony WH-1000XM3, NAD Viso HP50, Audioquest NightOwl Carbon, and Audeze LCD-X. I'm not going to make any inane claims about "bestness"—sound is inherently subjective because we all have different ears, heads, and frequency sensitivities. So these aren't the "best" headphones, just the best for my use case. It would be absurd to claim, for example, that these do vocals better than the HD650 or have better detail retrieval than the LCD-X. They don't. With that disclaimer out of the way, I like these headphones better than any I've owned before, but I want to clarify why that is. After a lot of experimentation (and expense), I realized that I want the following:
  • Closed back: sadly, I'm never in an environment quiet enough for open backs. This also has the fringe benefit of removing the most expensive headphones from consideration. :)
  • Good sound from any source: after years of messing with DACs and amps, I realized that adding more complexity to your playback chain is a major obstacle to enjoying music. The more upstream gear you add, the more likely you'll trade the simple pleasures of music for the neurotic pursuit of impossible perfection. This allowed me to rule out headphones that need an amp to shine, which really pares down the field.
  • Forgiving treble: I'm sensitive to high frequencies, so I tend to prefer "darker" to "brighter" sound signatures.
Putting all these factors together, these are what I've been looking for all these years, and while I could say I wish I'd known about them a few years and a few thousand dollars sooner, it's possible that if you meet your headphone match too soon, you won't recognize it. Once you embark on any sort of grail quest, you'll travel far even if it's just to end up close to where you started. So no regrets! :) In addition to fulfilling the requirements above, the E-MUs have the following sound highlights:
  • Awesome quality and quantity of bass: these are a basshead's dream come true: I would say bass response is the dominant feature of their sound. Note that the bass isn't as quick or dynamic as the NightOwl, to say nothing of the LCD-X.
  • Great treble extension without being painful: the Sony WH-1000XM3 and Oppo PM-3 are both examples of headphones whose treble rolls off too soon, to the point that some recordings sound lifeless or incomplete.
  • Smooth, natural timbre: perhaps unsurprisingly, the combination of two organic materials in critical places—biocellulose drivers and wooden ear cups—creates a very natural sound. There's a reason musical instruments and speaker cabinets are made of wood, and these headphones definitely benefit from the unique sonic properties of wood, in this case teak. This is their secret sauce relative to other closed headphones I've tried. This benefit is reduced if you don't listen to a lot of jazz and classical, though.
  • Soundstage is big and open for a closed design. There's good width, but not much depth.
  • Putting all this together with their undemanding power requirements, these are the solid headphones for gaming, even plugged straight into a PS4 controller. Video game sounds are usually V-shaped, so these are a natural fit. I would imagine they'd be perfect for movies too, but the only time I watch movies on headphones is during flights, and these aren't travel friendly.
Here are the not-so-great things about their sound (with stock pads):
  • Bass can be overpowering and boomy on certain tracks, crowding out the gentler mids.
  • As is the case with most V-shaped headphones, imaging isn't the best. These don't create a razor-sharp stereo image with clear instrument separation. They're warm and syrupy and kind of stir sounds together (with the exception of the highest frequencies). Depending on your tastes, this will either sound "musical/natural" or "congested." That said, these don't fall apart with fast/busy music like drum and bass or metal, so to me it's not a big deal. Even so, I don't think anyone would call these "analytical." If you like maximum detail and crystal-clear imaging (generally exemplified by the HD800 series), you probably won't like these.
  • Sibilance can be a real problem on some tracks, and this is true even after swapping to different earpads.
And finally, comfort/quality:
  • Ear openings are too small for Dumbos like me, which limits how long I can keep them on. Fortunately, the earpads are easy to swap, and I'm currently using the Brainwavz XL pads in leather. If you've got the coin, ZMF or Dekoni pads are probably even better. Changing to the larger and flatter Brainwavz pads significantly changed the sound, making it leaner and more open, but also harsher and more sibilant.
  • Headband is minimally padded and creates a hot spot on the crown of my head. Something like the ZMF Pilot Pad will correct this. You may not have this problem.
  • The earcups swivel! This is an underrated feature that makes a big difference in comfort.
  • These are pretty barebones for the price. There's nothing in the box but a 1/4" adapter and a business card for E-MU (lol). Seems odd for the price, but whatever.
  • Build quality is excellent. I'm sure this is equally true for everything built on the Foster 443742 platform, but all the structural bits seem to be metal, which reassures me about their longevity. Nothing creaks or squeaks, and the wooden cups are polished nicely.
  • The cable length is great for most situations, although when I plug them into my phone and walk around the house it looks and feels absolutely ridiculous because the cable is thick and unwieldy. You'd have to be a real maverick to wear these out.
Anyway, I think I've said more than enough about these, but if this helps even one person find headphone happiness, it will have been worth the time I spent writing this review. Thanks for reading!
(Edited)
Troglo
5
Mar 12, 2020
toniidesuWould you mind giving a more in depth comparison of these vs. lcd-x? I have some th-x00s that I love, but they’re kinda falling apart (I epoxied the hanger back on). I’ve been torn between the emu as a replacement saving for the Audeze lcd- x, based on a lot of research and internet recs. I joined the drop so I didn’t miss out, but I’m still dying to get a good comparison between the two for general use (gaming, movies, music, etc.). Mostly interested in how well the subbass of the x compares to the emu in quantity/quality with a strong subbass EQ (12+ dB or so at 20 Hz). Great review above, any additional feedback on this topic would be greatly appreciated!
toniidesu
320
Mar 16, 2020
TrogloHi @Troglo, sorry for the delay here. I can't give a good in-depth comparison between the Teak and the LCD-X because I sold my LCD-X over two years ago. Talking about sound from memory is notoriously unreliable, but having said that, I can mention some general things. I only ever listened to music with the LCD-X, and while the bass was incredible impressive (more rumble and texture than the Teak), I found the upper mids unpleasantly spiky. If you're less sensitive to treble, your mileage will vary. What is less subjective, though, is the comfort factor. The Audeze were a stark illustration of something that should've been obvious when I bought them: the best sound in the world doesn't make up for discomfort (for me), and I don't think anyone is arguing the LCD-X is the best-sounding headphone in the world. I would argue, however, that they're probably the most uncomfortable headphones I've ever owned. They are massively, absurdly heavy, they clamp pretty snugly, and the ultra-soft earpads compress quickly, bringing the Fazor waveguides to rest against your ear. Imagine a row of metal louvers pressed against the delicate cartilage of your ear. It sucks, and so does the headband, which is seriously underpowered for all the weight it's supporting. Some kind of suspension strap is almost obligatory—I got one made in Thailand on eBay. Unless you do a lot of neck exercises, I couldn't recommend the LCD-X for general use. It's just too awkward and uncomfortable to wear for any length of time, and gaming and watching things require you to be stationary for long periods, often with your head pointed down, which will exacerbate the strain on your neck. The Teak is a featherweight headphone by comparison, and after I swapped the earpads to Brainwavz XL and put a little pad on the strap, they're comfortable to wear for hours. Unless you have very large ears as I do, the stock pads will probably be just fine, and you might not have any issues with the strap. As a general-use headphone, the Teak is excellent and sounds good plugged into anything. Even though the LCD-X is marketed as sensitive enough for portable, low-power sources, it seemed to benefit more from an amp than the Teak does. The LCD-X stock cable is also a beast of a thing (in terms of length) that terminates in a 1/4" plug and connects to the headphones with twin mini-XLRs, which reveals its narrow intended use: mixing and mastering on pro gear. Really, my only knock on the E-MU so far is that the cable is overkill for my purposes. It's too big and too inflexible and just a little too long for plugging into things that aren't very far away. If you grab the removable cable version, this will obviously be moot, and you'll still save ~$700 over the LCD-X Creator Package, which you can use to buy canned food for the plague that's descending.
Troglo
5
Mar 17, 2020
toniidesuThank a bunch, I appreciate the feedback. I’ll actually have a chance to demo some Audeze gear this weekend if I want. If I do, I will pay close attention to what you mentioned there regarding comfort. It’ll probably be a quick test. I mostly just wanna bring my Loki along for the ride and see how much bass they kick out. So that comfort thing might’ve gone unnoticed, thanks again!
toniidesu
320
Mar 17, 2020
TrogloSure thing, glad to help! The final thing I'll say is that the E-MU is the most musical headphone I've owned. Many headphones, especially at the high end of the market, seem to prioritize sound reproduction over musicality. I felt the LCD-X fell into this category: heard analytically, it's an outstanding performer across the frequency range, but the whole still seemed to me less than the sum of its parts. It just lacked the sweetness and warmth I equate with music (to be fair, I listen to a lot of jazz and classical). The HD650/6XX is an exceptionally sweet headphone, especially for vocals. If you can get away with an open back and don't mind using an amp, I think it's probably the best value in the headphone world and becoming a better value all the time. If you're less concerned with musicality and don't mind something that's pointless without an amp, the Fostex T50RP Mk3 is an insane value and has some of the best bass I've ever heard. Good luck and let me know if I can answer any other questions!
(Edited)
PRODUCTS YOU MAY LIKE
Trending Posts in Audiophile