Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 27 conversations about:
CheezitsTakeTheWheel
12
Apr 21, 2016
bookmark_border
IanAnderson
2590
Apr 21, 2016
bookmark_border
CheezitsTakeTheWheelDress shirts are generally measured by neck and sleeve like you mention, but these come in alpha sizes. Providing garment measurements is actually more accurate because you can compare these measurements to shirts that you already own, rather than just guessing.
FJCruiser
49
Apr 24, 2016
bookmark_border
CheezitsTakeTheWheelIf you lay the shirt flat and measure the XL from arm-pit to arm-pit it will be 23". You double that, and get the chest size 46". This is the new way of measuring for the internet.
CheezitsTakeTheWheel
12
Apr 25, 2016
bookmark_border
FJCruiserThe "new way of measuring for the internet" as you call it is BANANAS.
I understand how to do it. I just don't want to. We don't need a new way to measure shirts.
These shirts are small and skinny. I am neither, therefore, I'm out.
I understand how to do it. I just don't want to. We don't need a new way to measure shirts.
These shirts are small and skinny. I am neither, therefore, I'm out.
FJCruiser
49
Apr 25, 2016
bookmark_border
CheezitsTakeTheWheelLOL... fortunately, i like bananas :) Seriously though, i personally prefer this way of measuring. I think it gives me a better understanding of the size. For example, I dont need half of my back to be included in my sleeve measurement.
Drop Refurbished
Like-new products you can trustDrop Rewards
Get $5 for every 500 points you earn! Learn more
Drop Keyboard Club
Become a member and expand your keycap collectionCollaborate With Us
For Brands & DesignersFollow Drop
What the heck is a XL with a 23" chest and 26" sleeves?