Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 33 conversations about:
Dinglebells
101
Oct 15, 2017
bookmark_border
search
Arrived quicker than I expected in the UK. Very pleased with it. The 44mm is right at the top end of what I'd wear, size wise. Get the feeling you'd need to be a fairly large guy to pull off the 46mm
Oct 15, 2017
RayF
22220
Jul 22, 2019
bookmark_border
DinglebellsLooks good on you; how’s it holding up? Long term impressions? Would by again?
Jul 22, 2019
Dinglebells
101
Jul 22, 2019
bookmark_border
RayFI actually ending up selling it after about a year of owning it. Not a reflection on the watch - just needing the funds for the next thing. I'd probably buy again, but if I did I'd probably go for the 42mm (personal preference - the long lugs meant the 44mm felt bigger than I'm comfortable with) and the purist version (just seems closer to the original design and I've gone off "caller gmt" watches vs "true GMT" ones). Couldn't fault the quality and the gradient dial was lovely. Got a lot of compliments from non-watch people if that means anything.
Jul 22, 2019
Dinglebells
101
Jul 22, 2019
bookmark_border
RayFOh I should add that one thing Glycine is very good at is making a thin sports watch. The low, kettle-shaped case really helps the wearability. The case shape is much more interesting in person that it is in renders.
Jul 22, 2019
View Full Discussion