Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 412 conversations about:
chris916
14
Apr 23, 2019
bookmark_border
getting my watch today in Malaysia, pretty nice quality but not something I expected - open to trade. ($100tier) The mystery box is definitely a good concept that i will be excited to commit. But come to the big disappointment will be NO transparency of how the draw going on (not hard to discover the similar thought by reading down the active comments) it also raise the concern that those staying in far, like myself will only be getting a light weighted watch most probably due to the cost saving of shipping. If this is real, It could just spoil the way of mystery box concepts and even the image of Massdrop and I hope Massdrop make a good declaration on this. No reason to join if this is not unveiled fully and fairly. Thanks if you are reading this
search

(Edited)
Apr 23, 2019
chris916
14
Apr 23, 2019
bookmark_border
Apr 23, 2019
willie2849
38
Apr 23, 2019
bookmark_border
chris916Some watches received were not even on the published lists. Why not Massdrop provide a list of all the watches sent out this far with both countries and weights for transparency. This is not to challenge the so called rules fixed by Massdrop. If watches are selected randomly for export there is no issue at all. If Massdrop was intending to clear all their watches by using the divide and destroy rule tot average our their shortfall than most people who can think like us will refrain to waste our money! There is no mystery here only scents of a misleading scam. I saw some flat watch box with lower value watches being sent to Malaysians. This is due to apathetic quality of this drop!
Apr 23, 2019
DynoMike
44
Apr 25, 2019
bookmark_border
willie2849You keep complaining about the watch you got, and keep suggesting that MD is conspiring against you, why not just delete your account instead of hanging around the forum only to complain about every watch you didn’t get?
Apr 25, 2019
View Full Discussion