Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Anzial
1494
May 16, 2015
Why is everyone voting for 970? It's not high-end, and there's that well known 3.5gb limitation.
t-sizzle
0
May 28, 2015
AnzialRegardless of the 'gimped' memory, it's still one of the best performing GPU's for the money.
Anzial
1494
May 28, 2015
t-sizzleyeah, and the performance tanks when games need over 3.5gb, so "for the money" argument goes out the window right away. Moreover, by buying this product you encourage nvidia to do this again in future, in fact, they already did by gimping Kepler in new titles via unoptimized drivers. Next year when Pascal hits, your 970 will meet the same fate and perform worse than a $150-$200 mid-range Pascal GPU.
t-sizzle
0
May 30, 2015
AnzialPascal is also going to be akin to a Tock from intel, a major, drastic architecture changex hbt memory, and a die shrink. If the 970 isnt smashed by pascal, then we have a serious issue.
Anzial
1494
May 30, 2015
t-sizzleYou are just confirming my argument and shooting your own in the foot. Who's gonna waste money on a crippled 970 which is gonna be replaced by a "smashingly" better bang for the buck Pascal in less than a year?