Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 284 conversations about:
RaptorMagnetic
3
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
How would these be for gaming?
Oct 29, 2018
Cokeman
1971
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticThis is out of the realm of headphones where that really matters. You are buying $600 headphones and worrying about gaming?
Oct 29, 2018
RaptorMagnetic
3
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
CokemanWell, I guess that answers my question... I mainly game with my K7xxs but I’ve been wanting to try planar magnetic cans and better overall audio would be an added bonus.
Oct 29, 2018
Afterman
237
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticThese are great for gaming actually. Imaging is fantastic while it's spacious sounding too.
Oct 29, 2018
jaydunndiddit
3262
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticThe HE4XX do well with gaming. I used them almost exclusively until I got the Elex. I still use them from to time to time and still enjoy them (more bass than the Elex). For their cost, they make a good planar worth gaming with.
Oct 29, 2018
Rayndalf
364
Oct 29, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticAssuming the games you play have decent positional audio with the stereo setting (say HRTF in CSGO) these would work well. For games with a lackluster stereo setting (bad enough that virtual surround sound offers an improvement) these would be at a disadvantage by not offering that. Considering pros regularly play with $50 earbuds, any headphones worth their salt should work well once you get accustomed to their signature and their soundstage (but IMO exaggerated sound stages can make positional audio more 'immersive' but somewhat deceptive). Also, keep worrying about gaming, videogames with quality sound design deserve to be appreciated, and their is more to soundstage accuracy and positional audio than the overdone 'its a keyboard in your right ear, now its your left ear' shtick
Oct 29, 2018
Squee
183
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticHaving used a good number of planars including the HE400i, HE4xx, LCD2C, and HE560, the only ones I'd game in regularly are the HE560. The HE400i/HE4xx get the job done, but the imaging is nothing to write home about. I've had better luck with the THx00 (despite the miniscule stage) because the imaging is pretty accurate, and above those, the Sennheiser HD58x and HD6xx work a treat for gaming. If you're goal is just gaming, any of thsoe would be a step up in imaging above the 7xx. And, this is purely personal, I'd take crap stage and sharp imaging over a huge stage and meh imaging any day.
Oct 30, 2018
jaydunndiddit
3262
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
SqueeI have the TRX00 Ebony's and they definitely do not have better imaging over the HE4XX nor do they have a larger soundstage. The one thing they do excel at in gaming is LFE. I'm going to assume you're not using any sort of AVR with your HE4XX (I game out of a Yamaha A3080). That made a world of difference for me in terms of power and audio decoding as they are quite power hungry. Even on the THX 789, I have to set the gain to 3 and the volume dial is at 3 o'clock and they still could take more power. I still personally prefer the Elex over everything due to their imaging, dynamic range, and separation. They do very well with shooters and sound wonderful with big open world games (playing RDR2 right now).
Oct 30, 2018
dnalekaw
211
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
CokemanI wouldn't say quite yet... My HD 800 SDR are still a massive improvement over the HD 58x, HE 4xx etc. when it comes to gaming. Although they could be considered some of the best, if not the absolute best headphones for gaming I see them as worth it for that purpose alone. Different people will prioritise headphones for gaming in different ways and I am certainly one of them. Since sound engines within games are also improving at a quick rate, the disparity between higher end and lower end audio products is broadening.
Oct 30, 2018
Squee
183
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
jaydunndidditI never said thx00 have larger sound stage. I said they image better, and they do. I play mostly competitive shooters, like Rainbow six, overwatch, pubg, ring of Elysium, etc. The he400/xx are competent, but I have gotten miscues from sound. Especially in elevation. I don't use any dsp, because a good headphone doesn't need them. My setup is PC to bimby to adcom gfp 555 which feeds out to an Aune x7s, 789, Mac 1900, and Lake people g103. I also have an Astro mixamp kicking around somewhere but not hooked up.
Oct 30, 2018
Squee
183
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
dnalekawI think his larger point is the effective benefits of totl headphones used for gaming show extremely diminishing returns, which is especially true considering the audio itself is likely very compressed, very affected by software dsp in engine, whereas the real benefits would probably reveal themselves listening to well-mastered, uncompressed recordings.
Oct 30, 2018
jaydunndiddit
3262
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
SqueeAgree to disagree on imaging. I'm using an AVR that's tailored to decoding audio streams without touching the signal in Pure Direct Mode via HDMI. That comment about DSP is pretty silly. DSP like EQ exists for a reason and I'd be pretty hard-pressed to not enjoy Atmos through my Focal's or any of my other "good" headphones. I used the HE4XX with Battlefield 1, Wolfenstein 2, Titanfall 2, Far Cry 5, Forza 7, Dirt 4, Rocket League, etc. I used to be more competitive in ranked league play but just didn't have the time to keep up with practicing. The 4XX help up very well in all settings and were dynamic enough to create the proper amount of range. As much as I love the Ebony's, they don't image well, have horrible depth, and really lack clarity in the mids compared to the other frequencies. Not to mention, their ringing/resonance can really throw off pinpointing exact locations and their 2nd order distortion is pretty high in the lower frequencies. Even with all that, they excel at movies and TV shows over the HE4XX. I think they have a place, just not for gaming. Just my .02 cents.
Oct 30, 2018
Squee
183
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
jaydunndidditSomething of a self defeating argument... TV shows are almost pure mids, which you like on thx00, but you don't like their mids? Distortion in low frequencies, but you like them in movies, which are just bass and mids. If AVR doesn't mess with the signal, no reason for 4xx to sound good specifically on that system and different from other non-dsp sources If DSP and EQ work so well, why buy good headphones at all? Just buy the cheapest headphones and EQ them. There's an unmentioned agreement that digitally altering a signal is precisely the opposite goal of high end audio, which is trying to bring you as close to the sound in the recording studio as possible, with as little distortion from the original signal as possible. If you honestly believe dsp and EQ can turn meh qualities into great qualities, there's no need for 599+ cans when software can fix hardware problems. Again, not arguing sound stage.
Oct 30, 2018
jaydunndiddit
3262
Oct 30, 2018
bookmark_border
SqueeWow. A lot to unpack here. TV shows are more than mids. TV shows cover a HUGE dynamic range that a lot of times you don't see in music. Movies are more than lows and mids. This is such an ignorant statement that it hurts. You understand that even Straight and Pure/Direct are DSP modes, right? And yet, they both can deliver an unmolested PCM audio stream via HDMI for 9 channels or headphones. The fact that you have something against DSP and EQ is bizarre. Hell, not to mention they still do make analog EQs that work very well (JDS labs springs to mind). There are many folks who EQ and mod their HD 650s and 800s and get more enjoyment out of them. So I guess those people are just tuning meh qualities to great ones via software, eh? You know that's an absurd statement. Some people like EQ, some like DSP, and others are purists. It has nothing to do about the quality of the headphone as garbage in still equals garbage out and EQ/DSP doesn't solve that. It just adds spice and flavor depending on your source and mood. Some of us like flexibility and tweaking. More so, when did we ever get into HiFi audio? We were talking about gaming which is what I have been responding to but you seem to be off-track. Again, I don't believe there's an "unmentioned agreement" in audio beyond attaining a neutral, reference sound. Of which, has MANY varying degrees of what the hell that even is. It's hard to come to a consensus on something when you don't have one to begin with. I know this is all our subjective opinion but the moment you mentioned gaming audio being so highly compressed you lost me. Just because your gaming setup doesn't utilize native audio streams doesn't mean the rest of us have a deficient setup for gaming. And considering your setup, it is not ideal for gaming let alone unpacking Dolby Atmos or DTS streams.
Oct 30, 2018
johnq1118
24
Nov 1, 2018
bookmark_border
RaptorMagneticFor gaming hd800, I game with th900, t1, he500, X2, 2000X, the senn 800 give me the best advantage.
Nov 1, 2018
View Full Discussion
Related Products