To negotiate the best possible price for our customers, we agree to hide prices prior to logging in.
1.6K requests
Product Description
With a 144 hertz refresh rate, a 4-millisecond response time, and G-Sync technology, this monitor is built for speed—which means it’s the perfect complement to a stellar gaming setup. Measuring 27 inches across, it’s plenty big enough for gaming, watching movies, and more, yet not so big that you can’t easily scan the full screen Read More
I picked this monitor up when the drop was live a few weeks ago. I love it. Only down side is that it's 1080 but I don't really care to spend the money for 2k or 4k.
Do they have a 32" 2560x1440 144Hz VA/IPS panel with G-Sync at a less than $500 price point? I'd buy that. I haven't had a 1080p monitor since 2013, and I'm not going back just for extra frames and adaptive sync technology.
I guess I should make my point clear: there's like 0.00001% of all PC users who has any need for gsync. So Nvidia couldn't care less about making it more affordable since it won't affect its bottom-line one bit, in fact, the opposite may be true.
1080p? Barf. I'll wait for the Dell S2716dg to go on sale for $350 again. With how long Massdrop deal take to ship, if probably still get the Dell first
Did you just say 4K? And at 1080p, I would be pulling well over 250 frames in OW. I can certainly hit 144 in almost every game if it is properly optimized. Shit, I’d probably hit close to 144 in Wildlands 1080p.
You also forget that graphics cards are not the problem at higher framerates and lower resolutions - the CPU bottleneck is usually what will hold you back in newer games.
You show all the characteristics of somebody who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
shabbaranksHahaha, clearly I don't know what I'm talking about as you didn't read my original comment. Good luck getting anywhere close to 144fps in Wildlands at 1080p without lowering settings. At Medium-High settings, sure you'll average 125fps with dips into 90s but at Ultra you'll be struggling to maintain 60fps. And in 4K, you'll be in the 40fps with dips into the high 20's and low 30's. IDK why you're trying to turn this into an argument as I run benchmarks of my own on on every preset then use custom settings to get the best graphics while maintaining a decent framerate.
Obviously you'll be CPU bound at lower resolutions as the CPU has to process the frames. And the higher you go in resolution the more GPU dependent you become. Some people go for performance, others flat out go for visuals. Personally, I desire both as I mainly play in VR where 90fps is the minimum targeted framerate without ending up using ASW or Multiprojection, where your FPS is locked to 45fps and smoothed out to maintain somewhat of a decent experience.
A headphone stand near the bottom of the display? Would think they need to be higher up for most full sized cans. Would also rather have it on the right side for my current setup.