To negotiate the best possible price for our customers, we agree to hide prices prior to logging in.
83 requests
·
5 Sold
Product Description
A compact, multifunctional device, the Moonshadow EP3A DAC/amp comes equipped with the well-regarded ESS ES9038Q2M DAC chip. For a seamless fit in your audio setup, it features a variety of inputs (including USB, optical, and coaxial) and outputs (including RCA and 6.5 millimeter) Read More
hideaki-samathey are different beasts, the ep3a has the better dac chip on paper and far more Inputs, but its very new , untested, unmeasured, amp section isn't known. ( I guess the dac will perform better) Its more a new Dac with some HPA integrated. the build quality isn't known.
the O2 and sdac are just solid, well known, measured, but just not longer nearly state of the art in this price range. Its more an old HPA with some entry dac integrated . its well build.
I would spend 50 $ (+shipping) more and combine the JDS Atom with the khadas tone board dac ...and end up with some state of the art setup.
hideaki-samaI'd pass on this. The lack of detailed specs for this unit does not bode well. The better DAC chip alone doesn't mean much given the lack of info unfortunately.
tokuichi_aoyamaUnfortunately Aliexpress has pretty much the same lackluster list of specs. It would be good to know the output impedance, output power, and have a better overall breakdown of the DAC & amp sections themselves.
It's colored but it's color only sounds attractive through tubes. All headphones aren't tuned for SS amp sound, or the 50,000 Sennheiser Orpheus wouldn't be paired with a tube amp.
Other colored headphones sound better with SS amps sure, but NOT the hd650. The hd650's coloration only sounds properly engaging through a tube amp. This is the 90 percent consensus. That's because it lacks low and high energy that it has to sound lively somehow, a sound it doesn't achieve through 99 percent of SS amps. I am sure that because the 650 is a modified 580/600 it was also originally designed for tubes and warmer systems, as the tech is decades old and commonly used in systems much warmer than we are using today. It really does sound absolutely *insert curse word here*ing and flat with no detail through SS bud.
And please don't assume my preferences as I hate U and V signatures, Just because I don't like the mid-oriented hd650 that fails to resolve good bass and treble, doesn't automatically mean I like V-shaped, lol.
I prefer flat headphones that resolve all frequencies accurately, up to the sparkle and down to the rumble. Not boosted, the hd650 is simply lacking. Maybe that's why their newest revisions of it in the 58x/660 attempted to resolve that issue? Or Sennheiser is stupid, Lmao.
Sorry to argue when you're wrong but this one's not up for debate.
Uzuzu"It's colored but it's color only sounds attractive through tubes. All headphones aren't tuned for SS amp sound, or the 50,000 Sennheiser Orpheus wouldn't be paired with a tube amp.
Other colored headphones sound better with SS amps sure, but NOT the hd650. The hd650's coloration only sounds properly engaging through a tube amp. This is the 90 percent consensus. That's because it lacks low and high energy that it has to sound lively somehow, a sound it doesn't achieve through 99 percent of SS amps. I am sure that because the 650 is a modified 580/600 it was also originally designed for tubes and warmer systems, as the tech is decades old and commonly used in systems much warmer than we are using today. It really does sound absolutely *insert curse word here*ing and flat with no detail through SS "
You really dont see that even if that would be correct you would support my point? It is Preference, if its a Company house sound (relative believe of their concept of good sound that is different from Company to Company) or if some hifi group mostly likes something some way its still relative and subjektive. Its not absolut and "just" true.
Example : If the 70 or 80 or 90 % actually like elevated bass more than linear bass, than isn't elevated bass universal needed for good sound. Its a question of Preference like "attractive" may indicate .
We can get measurements of accurate reproducing, but we cant actually find the universal good sound. We have very different concepts of good sound, like we have with everything that is perceived 'good'.
its seems everyone likes different.
"And please don't assume my preferences as I hate U and V signatures, Just because I don't like the mid-oriented hd650 that fails to resolve good bass and treble, doesn't automatically mean I like V-shaped, lol."
I wrote "if". I didn't wrote that you do. The hd 650 has relativly elevated bass and mids, its not just midoriented.
"Or Sennheiser is stupid, Lmao."
no there trying to make a profit. This sounding seems to be trending in their target group.
"Sorry to argue when you're wrong but this one's not up for debate."
Please don't do that. it isn't true just because its written. Actually we are debating.
Coloring and inaccurate measurements aren't really compatible with the "High Fidelity". the Term "Music or audio enthusiast" could be more accurate to describe this group of preference .