Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 30 conversations about:
breakjei
118
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
Would have jumped in if it was on USB C.
Sep 16, 2019
allard_van_der_kamp
56
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
breakjeiSo a charging port is a deciding factor on something that is primarily used without cable
Sep 16, 2019
breakjei
118
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
allard_van_der_kampFor me, yes. Since I've already started switching all my gear to USB C.
Sep 16, 2019
allard_van_der_kamp
56
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
breakjeiI mean I like the usb-c adaptor and I still get angry when company's make new products without usb-c. But with that being said, if something sounds great and its comfortable, the connector doesnt matter for me, might as well be miniB. You would lose out on so many great items just because they have an old connector.
Sep 16, 2019
breakjei
118
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
allard_van_der_kampGot your point. But the missing out thing works in favor for me too. Means that I can make better judgement of where I spend my money on.
Sep 16, 2019
refactorized
72
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
allard_van_der_kampFUCK YES if that port is as delicate, difficult, and prone to failure as the mistake we call micro-usb. If you can't charge these you can't use them, the fact that they are primarily used without a cable makes the problem worse here. The jack goes, you have a $340 fashion accessory. Ironically mini-b is a selling point for me, that connector was soooo much better than micro. C is nicer still though.
(Edited)
Sep 16, 2019
allard_van_der_kamp
56
Sep 16, 2019
bookmark_border
refactorizedI mean, they could have gone for micro b type 3.0
Sep 16, 2019
refactorized
72
Sep 18, 2019
bookmark_border
allard_van_der_kamp"I mean, they could have gone for micro b type 3.0" why would you say such a thing!? the horror
Sep 18, 2019
View Full Discussion
Related Products